Total submissions: 9
Submitter | RCV | SCV | Clinical significance | Condition | Last evaluated | Review status | Method | Comment |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Eurofins Ntd Llc |
RCV000514310 | SCV000109798 | uncertain significance | not provided | 2018-07-24 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | |
Gene |
RCV000514310 | SCV000512022 | uncertain significance | not provided | 2021-11-01 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Identified in a patient with familial hypercholesterolemia (Johansen et al., 2014), although the association of this variant with this lipid disorder is unclear; In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 24503134, 26764160, 15173240, 29431110, 32054689, 31130284) |
Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, |
RCV000514310 | SCV000609529 | uncertain significance | not provided | 2017-04-24 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | |
Labcorp Genetics |
RCV000077969 | SCV000755842 | likely benign | Muscle AMP deaminase deficiency | 2024-01-22 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | |
Ce |
RCV000514310 | SCV000780294 | uncertain significance | not provided | 2019-08-01 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | |
Mayo Clinic Laboratories, |
RCV000077969 | SCV000782670 | uncertain significance | Muscle AMP deaminase deficiency | 2017-05-26 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | |
Revvity Omics, |
RCV000077969 | SCV003826221 | uncertain significance | Muscle AMP deaminase deficiency | 2019-12-03 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | |
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, |
RCV003226192 | SCV003922529 | uncertain significance | not specified | 2023-03-19 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Variant summary: AMPD1 c.930G>T (p.Met310Ile) results in a conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0033 in 251424 control chromosomes in the gnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. This frequency does not allowing conclusions about variant significance, although the presence of homozygotes points to a benign outcome for a condition with full penetrance expected at an early age. Although c.930G>T has been reported in the literature, these report(s) do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Muscle AMP Deaminase Deficiency (example, PMID: 24503134, 31847883). To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Seven clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation (VUS, n=6; LB, n=1). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as uncertain significance. |
Clinical Genomics Laboratory, |
RCV000077969 | SCV004100859 | uncertain significance | Muscle AMP deaminase deficiency | 2021-01-06 | no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | The p.Met343Ile variant in the AMPD1 gene has been previously reported in at least 3 unrelated individuals, including 1 individual who was heterozygous for this variant with progressive muscle weakness, high creatine, and utilized a wheelchair (Monies et al., 2019), 1 individual with myopathy without information to determine zygosity (Toyama et al., 2004), and at least 1 individual without information regarding clinical features or information to determine zygosity (Reuter et al., 2018). The highest allele frequency of this variant in a non-founder population was identified in the Latino/Admixed American population at 170/35,438 chromosomes (0.48%) by the Genome Aggregation Database (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/). Functional studies of the p.Met343Ile variant are supportive of a deleterious effect to the protein; however, it is unclear if this would be sufficient to be disease-causing (Toyama et al., 2004). Computational tools predict that this variant is deleterious; however, the accuracy of in silico algorithms is limited. These data were assessed using the ACMG/AMP variant interpretation guidelines. In summary, the significance of the p.Met343Ile variant is uncertain. Additional information is needed to resolve the significance of this variant. [ACMG evidence codes used: PP3] |