Total submissions: 3
Submitter | RCV | SCV | Clinical significance | Condition | Last evaluated | Review status | Method | Comment |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Medical Molecular Genetics Department, |
RCV000656131 | SCV000609485 | pathogenic | Mucopolysaccharidosis type 6 | 2015-12-01 | criteria provided, single submitter | research | |
Laboratory of Diagnosis and Therapy of Lysosomal Disorders, |
RCV000656131 | SCV000803050 | uncertain significance | Mucopolysaccharidosis type 6 | 2018-01-01 | criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Absent from GnomAD (PM2) |
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, |
RCV001584227 | SCV001821505 | uncertain significance | not specified | 2021-08-10 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Variant summary: ARSB c.288C>G (p.Ser96Arg) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Five of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant was absent in 142908 control chromosomes. The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. c.288C>G has been reported in the literature in one individual affected with Mucopolysaccharidosis Type VI (Maroteaux-Lamy Syndrome). This report does not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Mucopolysaccharidosis Type VI (Maroteaux-Lamy Syndrome). To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Two clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. One laboratory classified the variant as pathogenic, and one laboratory classified the variant as uncertain significance. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as uncertain significance. |