ClinVar Miner

Submissions for variant NM_000051.4(ATM):c.7724C>A (p.Pro2575Gln)

dbSNP: rs1591172186
Minimum review status: Collection method:
Minimum conflict level:
ClinVar version:
Total submissions: 2
Download table as spreadsheet
Submitter RCV SCV Clinical significance Condition Last evaluated Review status Method Comment
Ambry Genetics RCV001026756 SCV001189196 uncertain significance Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome 2019-04-29 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing The p.P2575Q variant (also known as c.7724C>A), located in coding exon 51 of the ATM gene, results from a C to A substitution at nucleotide position 7724. The proline at codon 2575 is replaced by glutamine, an amino acid with similar properties. This amino acid position is well conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be tolerated by in silico analysis. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear.
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp RCV001345556 SCV001539679 uncertain significance Ataxia-telangiectasia syndrome 2020-10-15 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals with ATM-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 827222). Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function (SIFT, PolyPhen-2, Align-GVGD) all suggest that this variant is likely to be tolerated, but these predictions have not been confirmed by published functional studies and their clinical significance is uncertain. This variant is not present in population databases (ExAC no frequency). This sequence change replaces proline with glutamine at codon 2575 of the ATM protein (p.Pro2575Gln). The proline residue is weakly conserved and there is a moderate physicochemical difference between proline and glutamine.

The information on this website is not intended for direct diagnostic use or medical decision-making without review by a genetics professional. Individuals should not change their health behavior solely on the basis of information contained on this website. Neither the University of Utah nor the National Institutes of Health independently verfies the submitted information. If you have questions about the information contained on this website, please see a health care professional.