ClinVar Miner

Submissions for variant NM_000057.4(BLM):c.98+3_98+6del

dbSNP: rs1555418015
Minimum review status: Collection method:
Minimum conflict level:
ClinVar version:
Total submissions: 3
Download table as spreadsheet
Submitter RCV SCV Clinical significance Condition Last evaluated Review status Method Comment
Counsyl RCV000665548 SCV000789690 uncertain significance Bloom syndrome 2017-02-09 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp RCV000665548 SCV001400594 uncertain significance Bloom syndrome 2019-10-24 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. Nucleotide substitutions within the consensus splice site are a relatively common cause of aberrant splicing (PMID: 17576681, 9536098). Algorithms developed to predict the effect of sequence changes on RNA splicing suggest that this variant may disrupt the consensus splice site, but this prediction has not been confirmed by published transcriptional studies. This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals with BLM-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 550724). This variant is not present in population databases (ExAC no frequency). This sequence change falls in intron 2 of the BLM gene. It does not directly change the encoded amino acid sequence of the BLM protein, but it affects a nucleotide within the consensus splice site of the intron.
Ambry Genetics RCV002386142 SCV002693515 uncertain significance Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome 2022-10-27 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing The c.98+3_98+6delAAGT intronic variant, located in intron 1 of the BLM gene, results from a deletion of 4 nucleotides (AAGT) at positions c.98+3 to c.98+6 in intron 1 of the BLM gene. This nucleotide region is highly conserved in available vertebrate species. In silico splice site analysis predicts that this alteration will weaken the native splice donor site. Another alteration at the same donor site (c.98+1G>T) with the same predicted splicing impact has been reported in a compound heterozygous state with the Ashkenazi founder mutation (c.2207_2212delinsTAGATTC) in a child with Bloom syndrome (German J et al. Hum. Mutat. 2007 Aug;28(8):743-53). Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear.

The information on this website is not intended for direct diagnostic use or medical decision-making without review by a genetics professional. Individuals should not change their health behavior solely on the basis of information contained on this website. Neither the University of Utah nor the National Institutes of Health independently verfies the submitted information. If you have questions about the information contained on this website, please see a health care professional.