Total submissions: 4
Submitter | RCV | SCV | Clinical significance | Condition | Last evaluated | Review status | Method | Comment |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Labcorp Genetics |
RCV000637707 | SCV000759179 | uncertain significance | Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome | 2022-01-26 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | This sequence change replaces proline, which is neutral and non-polar, with serine, which is neutral and polar, at codon 1062 of the BRCA2 protein (p.Pro1062Ser). This variant is not present in population databases (gnomAD no frequency). This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with breast cancer (PMID: 29215753, 30287823). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 531391). Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) performed at Invitae indicates that this missense variant is not expected to disrupt BRCA2 protein function. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. |
Ambry Genetics | RCV001019046 | SCV001180353 | uncertain significance | Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome | 2023-06-21 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | The p.P1062S variant (also known as c.3184C>T), located in coding exon 10 of the BRCA2 gene, results from a C to T substitution at nucleotide position 3184. The proline at codon 1062 is replaced by serine, an amino acid with similar properties. This alteration was identified in a cohort of patients diagnosed with biliary tract carcinoma undergoing multigene panel testing for hereditary cancer risk (Terashima T et al. Oncotarget. 2019 Oct;10:5949-5957). This alteration was observed with an allele frequency of 0.00014 in 7,051 unselected female breast cancer patients and was not observed in 11,241 female controls of Japanese ancestry. In addition, it was not observed in unselected male breast cancer patients and was observed with an allele frequency of 0.0001 in 12490 male controls of Japanese ancestry (Momozawa Y et al. Nat Commun. 2018 10;9:4083). This amino acid position is well conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be tolerated by in silico analysis. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. |
University of Washington Department of Laboratory Medicine, |
RCV001019046 | SCV003851746 | likely benign | Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome | 2023-03-23 | criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Missense variant in a coldspot region where missense variants are very unlikely to be pathogenic (PMID:31911673). |
All of Us Research Program, |
RCV004003847 | SCV004845118 | uncertain significance | Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2 | 2023-11-02 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | This missense variant replaces proline with serine at codon 1062 of the BRCA2 protein. Computational prediction suggests that this variant may not impact protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold <= 0.5, PMID: 27666373). To our knowledge, functional studies have not been reported for this variant. This variant has been reported in two individuals affected with breast and/or ovarian cancer and 3 unaffected individuals (PMID: 29215753, 30287823, 33471991; Leiden Open Variation Database DB-ID BRCA2_006350). This variant also has been detected in a pancreatic and a prostate cancer case-control study, in which it was detected in an unaffected individual in each study and absent in cancer cases (PMID: 31214711, 32980694). This variant has not been identified in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. |