ClinVar Miner

Submissions for variant NM_000059.4(BRCA2):c.6953G>A (p.Arg2318Gln)

gnomAD frequency: 0.00001  dbSNP: rs80358921
Minimum review status: Collection method:
Minimum conflict level:
ClinVar version:
Total submissions: 15
Download table as spreadsheet
Submitter RCV SCV Clinical significance Condition Last evaluated Review status Method Comment
Evidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA) RCV000077390 SCV001161528 benign Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2 2019-06-18 reviewed by expert panel curation IARC class based on posterior probability from multifactorial likelihood analysis, thresholds for class as per Plon et al. 2008 (PMID: 18951446). Class 1 based on posterior probability = 0.000238
Invitae RCV001086727 SCV000073109 likely benign Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome 2023-12-24 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
Ambry Genetics RCV000131677 SCV000186713 likely benign Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome 2018-06-27 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity.
GeneDx RCV000656799 SCV000210409 likely benign not provided 2019-09-05 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing Not observed at a significant frequency in large population cohorts (Lek et al., 2016); In silico analysis, which includes protein predictors and evolutionary conservation, supports that this variant does not alter protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 10923033, 21702907, 25452441, 17972171, 25348012, 27153395, 21990134, 16489001, 21990165, 21741379, 22711857, 26941049, 21952622, 25479140, 31131967)
Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Queen's University RCV000168594 SCV000588112 likely benign not specified 2017-04-20 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health RCV000131677 SCV000903879 likely benign Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome 2016-05-02 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano RCV000656799 SCV001133882 likely benign not provided 2023-04-07 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
Mendelics RCV000077390 SCV001139164 benign Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2 2019-05-28 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario RCV000735593 SCV002043400 uncertain significance Breast and/or ovarian cancer 2021-07-03 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp RCV000168594 SCV002572212 benign not specified 2022-08-22 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing Variant summary: BRCA2 c.6953G>A (p.Arg2318Gln) results in a conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 8e-06 in 250152 control chromosomes. The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. c.6953G>A has been reported in the literature as a VUS in individuals affected with/undergoing testing for breast and/or ovarian cancer (example, Chenevix-Trench_2018, Hondow_2011, Kote-Jarai_2011, Alsop_2012). These report(s) do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome. Multifactorial probability models have reported a neutral outcome (Lindor_2012). Co-occurrences with other pathogenic variant(s) have been reported in various databases and in the literature (BRCA2 c.2330dup, p.Asp777fs; BRCA1 c.2071delA, p.Arg691fs), providing supporting evidence for a benign role. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories and an expert panel (ENIGMA) have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation and a predominant consensus as benign/likely benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign.
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences RCV004537203 SCV004713909 likely benign BRCA2-related disorder 2024-02-14 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications).
Sharing Clinical Reports Project (SCRP) RCV000077390 SCV000109187 likely benign Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2 2012-03-29 no assertion criteria provided clinical testing
Breast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA2) RCV000077390 SCV000146980 uncertain significance Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2 2002-05-29 no assertion criteria provided clinical testing
Foulkes Cancer Genetics LDI, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research RCV000735593 SCV000863731 uncertain significance Breast and/or ovarian cancer no assertion criteria provided clinical testing
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System RCV001354760 SCV001549452 uncertain significance Malignant tumor of breast no assertion criteria provided clinical testing The BRCA2 p.Arg2318Gln variant was identified in 5 of 12202 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.0004) from individuals or families with breast, ovarian, prostate, and pancreatic cancer and was not identified in 360 control chromosomes from healthy individuals (Alsop_2012, Kote-Jarai_2011, Couch_2015, Dos Santos Vidal_2016, Grant_2015, Chenevix-Trench_2006). The variant was also identified in the following databases: dbSNP (ID: rs80358921) as “With other allele”, ClinVar and Clinvitae (6x as likely benign by Ambry Genetics, COGR, Invitae, SCRP and as uncertain significance by GeneDx, BIC), LOVD 3.0 (5x), UMD-LSDB (5 entries as uncertain significance and in one case the p.Arg2318Gln variant has been reported as co-occurring with a pathogenic variant of BRCA2 gene (c.2330dup, p.Asp777GlnfsX11), BIC Database (4x), ARUP Laboratories (1x as “class 2-likely not pathogenic or of little clinical significance”). The variant was not identified in Cosmic, MutDB and Zhejiang Colon Cancer Database. The variant was identified in control databases in 2 of 244730 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.000008 (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). It was observed in the following populations: Latino in 1 of 33426 chromosomes (freq: 0.00003), European Non-Finnish in 1 of 111204 chromosomes (freq: 0.000009); but not observed in the African, Other, Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, European Finnish, and South Asian populations. A functional study showed decreased cell survival and a higher rate of apoptosis in response to cisplatin as compared to wild-type (Warren_2011). The p.Arg2318 residue is not conserved in mammals and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) provide inconsistent predictions regarding the impact to the protein; this information is not very predictive of pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and 1 of 5 in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) predict a greater than 10% difference in splicing; this is not very predictive of pathogenicity. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time. This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance.

The information on this website is not intended for direct diagnostic use or medical decision-making without review by a genetics professional. Individuals should not change their health behavior solely on the basis of information contained on this website. Neither the University of Utah nor the National Institutes of Health independently verfies the submitted information. If you have questions about the information contained on this website, please see a health care professional.