ClinVar Miner

Submissions for variant NM_000059.4(BRCA2):c.7987G>A (p.Glu2663Lys)

dbSNP: rs80359030
Minimum review status: Collection method:
Minimum conflict level:
ClinVar version:
Total submissions: 8
Download table as spreadsheet
Submitter RCV SCV Clinical significance Condition Last evaluated Review status Method Comment
Ambry Genetics RCV000163114 SCV000213624 pathogenic Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome 2020-01-23 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing The p.E2663K variant (also known as c.7987G>A), located in coding exon 17 of the BRCA2 gene, results from a G to A substitution at nucleotide position 7987. The glutamic acid at codon 2663 is replaced by lysine, an amino acid with similar properties. This variant is located in the helical domain of the C-terminal DNA binding domain. This alteration was detected in a patient diagnosed with breast cancer, ovarian cancer, and uterine stromal sarcoma and who had a family history of breast cancer (Miolo G et al. Cancer Biol Ther. 2016 Oct 2;17(10):1017-1021). In addition, this variant segregated with disease in multiple families (Ambry internal data). This alteration was also found deleterious in a homology directed repair assay (Hart SN et al. Genet. Med., 2019 01;21:71-80). Based on internal structural analysis, this variant is anticipated to result in a significant decrease in structural stability (Yang H et al. Science, 2002 Sep;297:1837-48). This amino acid position is highly conserved in available vertebrate species. Based on the supporting evidence, this alteration is interpreted as a disease-causing mutation.
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp RCV001324234 SCV001515180 likely pathogenic Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome 2023-03-10 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing In summary, the currently available evidence indicates that the variant is pathogenic, but additional data are needed to prove that conclusively. Therefore, this variant has been classified as Likely Pathogenic. This variant disrupts the p.Glu2663 amino acid residue in BRCA2. Other variant(s) that disrupt this residue have been determined to be pathogenic (PMID: 16489001, 18451181, 18607349, 28339459). This suggests that this residue is clinically significant, and that variants that disrupt this residue are likely to be disease-causing. Experimental studies have shown that this missense change affects BRCA2 function (PMID: 29884841). Advanced modeling performed at Invitae incorporating data from internal and/or published experimental studies (PMID: 33609447) indicates that this missense variant is expected to disrupt BRCA2 function. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 52461). This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with breast cancer, ovarian cancer and uterine stromal sarcoma (PMID: 27561088). This variant is present in population databases (rs80359030, gnomAD 0.0009%). This sequence change replaces glutamic acid, which is acidic and polar, with lysine, which is basic and polar, at codon 2663 of the BRCA2 protein (p.Glu2663Lys).
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories RCV001811313 SCV002049373 likely pathogenic not provided 2020-12-30 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing The BRCA2 c.7987G>A; p.Glu2663Lys variant (rs80359030) is reported in the literature in at least one individual affected with breast and ovarian cancer (Miolo 2016). This variant is also reported in ClinVar (Variation ID: 52461), and is only observed on one allele in the Genome Aggregation Database, indicating it is not a common polymorphism. The glutamic acid at codon 2663 is highly conserved, and computational analyses predict that this variant is deleterious (REVEL: 0.824). In vitro functional analyses of the variant protein demonstrate reduced homology-directed repair activity (Hart 2019). Additionally, another variants at this codon (c.7988A>T; p.Glu2663Val) has been reported in several families with breast and ovarian cancer and is considered pathogenic (Chenevix-Trench 2006, Rebbeck 2018). Based on available information, the p.Glu2663Lys variant is considered to be likely pathogenic. References: Chenevix-Trench G et al. Genetic and histopathologic evaluation of BRCA1 and BRCA2 DNA sequence variants of unknown clinical significance. Cancer Res. 2006 Feb 15;66(4):2019-27. Hart SN et al. Comprehensive annotation of BRCA1 and BRCA2 missense variants by functionally validated sequence-based computational prediction models. Genet Med. 2019 Jan;21(1):71-80. Miolo et al. Association of the germline BRCA2 missense variation Glu2663Lys with high sensitivity to trabectedin-based treatment in soft tissue sarcoma. Cancer Biol Ther. 2016 Oct 2;17(10):1017-1021. Rebbeck TR et al. Mutational spectrum in a worldwide study of 29,700 families with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. Hum Mutat. 2018 May;39(5):593-620.
Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital RCV001811313 SCV002551701 pathogenic not provided 2023-08-15 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
Sharing Clinical Reports Project (SCRP) RCV000077421 SCV000109219 uncertain significance Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2 2009-01-13 no assertion criteria provided clinical testing
Breast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA2) RCV000077421 SCV000147241 uncertain significance Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2 2004-02-20 no assertion criteria provided clinical testing
Pathway Genomics RCV000077421 SCV000189902 uncertain significance Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2 2014-07-24 no assertion criteria provided clinical testing
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System RCV001354518 SCV001549158 uncertain significance Malignant tumor of breast no assertion criteria provided clinical testing The BRCA2 p.Glu2663Lys variant was identified in the literature however the frequency of this variant in an affected population was not provided. The variant was identified in germline and in sarcoma tissue of a patient with breast, ovarian and a synchronous poorly differentiated stromal uterine sarcoma (Miolo 2016). The auhors felt that patient obtained a complete metabolic response after only 3 cycles of trabectedin treatment, most likely due to presence of this potentially deleterious mutation and the tumor loss of the wild-type BRCA2 allele. The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs80359030) as "With Pathogenic, Uncertain significance allele”, ClinVar (classified as uncertain significance by Ambry Genetics, SCRP, BIC and Pathway Genomics), Clinvitae, LOVD 3.0 (1x predicted deleterious), and BIC (4x unknown clinical importance). The variant was not identified in GeneInsight-COGR, Cosmic, MutDB, UMD-LSDB, ARUP Laboratories, or Zhejiang University databases. The variant was identified in control databases in 1 of 245100 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.000004 (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in European population in 1 of 111014 chromosomes (freq: 0.00001), while the variant was not observed in the African, Other, Latino, Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, Finnish, or South Asian populations. The p.Glu2663 residue is conserved across mammals and other organisms, and four out of five computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) suggest that the variant may impact the protein; however, this information is not predictive enough to assume pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. In addition, two studies calculated protein likelihood ratios and results are in favor of protein loss of function due to the variant (Karchin 2008, Miolo 2016). In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time. This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance.

The information on this website is not intended for direct diagnostic use or medical decision-making without review by a genetics professional. Individuals should not change their health behavior solely on the basis of information contained on this website. Neither the University of Utah nor the National Institutes of Health independently verfies the submitted information. If you have questions about the information contained on this website, please see a health care professional.