ClinVar Miner

Submissions for variant NM_000059.4(BRCA2):c.9433G>C (p.Val3145Leu)

gnomAD frequency: 0.00001  dbSNP: rs587776476
Minimum review status: Collection method:
Minimum conflict level:
ClinVar version:
Total submissions: 12
Download table as spreadsheet
Submitter RCV SCV Clinical significance Condition Last evaluated Review status Method Comment
Ambry Genetics RCV000129373 SCV000184137 likely benign Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome 2019-05-02 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity.
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp RCV001088631 SCV000283368 likely benign Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome 2024-01-28 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp RCV000499802 SCV000695239 likely benign not specified 2020-10-26 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing Variant summary: BRCA2 c.9433G>C (p.Val3145Leu) results in a conservative amino acid change located in the BRCA2, OB3 domain of the encoded protein sequence. Five of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 1.2e-05 in 251342 control chromosomes. The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. c.9433G>C has been reported in the literature in at-least one individual affected with cancer (example, McVeigh_2013). Theis report does not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome. At-least one co-occurrence with another pathogenic variant has been observed at our laboratory ( BRCA2 c.3847_3848delGT , p.V1283fs*2), providing supporting evidence for a benign role. Additionally, this variant was found to co-occur with a pathogenic BRIP1 variant (c.2392C>T; p.R798*) at our laboratory, however, this evidence is captured with caution as the pathogenicity of this specific loss of function (LOF) variant in BRIP1 (p.Arg798Ter) in addition to all other truncating BRIP1 variants in regards to their breast cancer risk has recently been called into question (PMID:26921362). To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Six clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. Multiple laboratories reported the variant with conflicting assessments (benign/likely benign, n=4). Based on the evidence outlined above and to reflect the emerging majority consensus in the field, the variant was re-classified as likely benign.
GeneDx RCV001353675 SCV000715915 likely benign not provided 2019-05-23 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 23884708)
St. Jude Molecular Pathology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital RCV001088631 SCV000891080 uncertain significance Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome 2021-09-01 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health RCV000129373 SCV000903031 benign Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome 2016-11-18 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina RCV000144220 SCV001267534 uncertain significance Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2 2017-04-27 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. However, the evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was not sufficient to rule this variant in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance.
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina RCV001114170 SCV001272016 uncertain significance Fanconi anemia complementation group D1 2017-04-27 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance.
Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano RCV001353675 SCV004220653 uncertain significance not provided 2023-07-17 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing In the published literature, this variant has been reported in individuals with breast and/or ovarian cancer (PMIDs: 23884708 (2014) and 34326862 (2021)). The frequency of this variant in the general population, 0.000026 (3/113678 chromosomes (Genome Aggregation Database, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org)), is uninformative in the assessment of its pathogenicity. Analysis of this variant using bioinformatics tools for the prediction of the effect of amino acid changes on protein structure and function yielded predictions that this variant is benign. Based on the available information, we are unable to determine the clinical significance of this variant.
Sharing Clinical Reports Project (SCRP) RCV000144220 SCV000189323 benign Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2 2012-01-04 no assertion criteria provided clinical testing
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System RCV001353675 SCV000592287 uncertain significance not provided no assertion criteria provided clinical testing The BRCA2 p.Val3145Leu variant was not identified in the literature, nor was it identified in the dbSNP, 1000 Genomes Project, NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project, HGMD, LOVD, COSMIC, UMD or BIC databases. The p.Val3145 residue is not conserved in mammals and the variant amino acid leucine (Leu) is present in zebrafish, increasing the likelihood that this variant does not have clinical significance. Computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein; however, this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. In summary, based on the above information, the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time. This variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance.
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences RCV004532550 SCV004730014 uncertain significance BRCA2-related disorder 2023-10-25 no assertion criteria provided clinical testing The BRCA2 c.9433G>C variant is predicted to result in the amino acid substitution p.Val3145Leu. This variant has been reported in one individual with a personal and family history of breast cancer (Table S4, Bhai et al 2021. PubMed ID: 34326862). It was also reported in one individual in an Irish cohort with suspected hereditary breast and ovarian cancers; however, specific information related to this patient's phenotype and cancer history was not provided (McVeigh et al. 2014. PubMed ID: 23884708). This variant is reported in 0.0026% of alleles in individuals of European (Non-Finnish) descent in gnomAD (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/13-32969002-G-C) and has conflicting interpretations in ClinVar ranging from uncertain significance to benign (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/141038/). At this time, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain due to the absence of conclusive functional and genetic evidence.

The information on this website is not intended for direct diagnostic use or medical decision-making without review by a genetics professional. Individuals should not change their health behavior solely on the basis of information contained on this website. Neither the University of Utah nor the National Institutes of Health independently verfies the submitted information. If you have questions about the information contained on this website, please see a health care professional.