ClinVar Miner

Submissions for variant NM_000104.4(CYP1B1):c.592G>A (p.Val198Ile)

gnomAD frequency: 0.00009  dbSNP: rs59472972
Minimum review status: Collection method:
Minimum conflict level:
ClinVar version:
Total submissions: 6
Download table as spreadsheet
Submitter RCV SCV Clinical significance Condition Last evaluated Review status Method Comment
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina RCV001142193 SCV001302606 uncertain significance Irido-corneo-trabecular dysgenesis 2017-04-27 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance.
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina RCV001142194 SCV001302607 uncertain significance Glaucoma 3A 2017-04-27 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance.
GeneDx RCV001759901 SCV001985453 uncertain significance not provided 2019-07-15 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing Identified in the heterozygous state in a Japanese individual with primary congenital glaucoma and in a Chinese individual with primary open-angle glaucoma, and a second CYP1B1 variant was not reported in these individuals (Mashima et al., 2001; Chen et al., 2015); In silico analysis, which includes protein predictors and evolutionary conservation, supports that this variant does not alter protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 25527694, 11527932, 26550445)
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp RCV002282462 SCV002571947 uncertain significance not specified 2022-08-11 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing Variant summary: CYP1B1 c.592G>A (p.Val198Ile) results in a conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Five of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00028 in 187934 control chromosomes (gnomAD and publication data). This frequency is not significantly higher than expected for a pathogenic variant in CYP1B1 causing Primary Congenital Glaucoma (0.00028 vs 0.0043), allowing no conclusion about variant significance. c.592G>A has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Primary Congenital Glaucoma (Mashima_2001, Chen_2008, Gong_2015, Liu_2020). These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Primary Congenital Glaucoma. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Two ClinVar submitters (evaluation after 2014) cite the variant as uncertain significance. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as uncertain significance.
Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics RCV002491424 SCV002799766 uncertain significance Glaucoma 3A; Glaucoma 3, primary infantile, B; Anterior segment dysgenesis 6 2022-04-04 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
Invitae RCV003758998 SCV004374903 benign Congenital glaucoma 2024-01-09 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing

The information on this website is not intended for direct diagnostic use or medical decision-making without review by a genetics professional. Individuals should not change their health behavior solely on the basis of information contained on this website. Neither the University of Utah nor the National Institutes of Health independently verfies the submitted information. If you have questions about the information contained on this website, please see a health care professional.