ClinVar Miner

Submissions for variant NM_000104.4(CYP1B1):c.958G>T (p.Val320Leu)

dbSNP: rs72549382
Minimum review status: Collection method:
Minimum conflict level:
ClinVar version:
Total submissions: 6
Download table as spreadsheet
Submitter RCV SCV Clinical significance Condition Last evaluated Review status Method Comment
Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Soonchunhyang University Medical Center RCV000490426 SCV000267279 uncertain significance Glaucoma 3A 2016-03-18 criteria provided, single submitter reference population
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) RCV000312523 SCV000342292 uncertain significance not provided 2016-05-17 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina RCV000490426 SCV000914926 uncertain significance Glaucoma 3A 2018-10-23 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing The CYP1B1 c.958G>T (p.Val320Leu) missense variant has been reported in at least four studies, in which it is found in a total of 13 individuals with primary congenital glaucoma, including in two in a compound heterozygous state, and in 11 in a heterozygous state in whom a second variant was not identified (Mashima et al. 2001; Kim et al. 2011; Su & Kee 2012; Do et al. 2016). The p.Val320Leu variant was also present in three additional individuals with primary open angle glaucoma, but the zygosity of the variant was unknown (Gong et al. 2015). The p.Val320Leu variant was present in four of 942 ethnically-matched control subjects and is reported at a frequency of 0.003615 in the East Asian population of the Genome Aggregation Database. Based on the evidence, the p. Val320Leu variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance but suspicious for pathogenicity for primary congenital glaucoma. This variant was observed by ICSL as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population.
Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics RCV002485372 SCV002793162 uncertain significance Glaucoma 3A; Glaucoma 3, primary infantile, B; Anterior segment dysgenesis 6 2022-04-11 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp RCV003488467 SCV004240895 uncertain significance not specified 2023-12-12 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing Variant summary: CYP1B1 c.958G>T (p.Val320Leu) results in a conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00031 in 248424 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.0038 within the East Asian subpopulation in the gnomAD database. This frequency is not significantly higher than estimated for a pathogenic variant in CYP1B1 causing Primary Congenital Glaucoma (0.0038 vs 0.0043), allowing no conclusion about variant significance. c.958G>T has been reported in the literature, primarily in the heterozygous state, in individuals of East Asian ancestry affected with Primary Congenital Glaucoma (e.g. Mashima_2001, Kim_2011, Chen_2014, Do_2016), individuals with primary open-angle glaucoma (Gong_2015), and also in healthy controls (Kim_2011, Gong_2015). The variant was also found in the homozygous state in the unaffected mother of a heterozygous individual with Primary Congenital Glaucoma, providing supporting evidence for a benign role. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. The following publications have been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 24227805, 26550974, 25527694, 21850185, 11527932, 12598442, 22942166). Four submitters have cited clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014. All submitters classified the variant as uncertain significance. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as uncertain significance.
Invitae RCV003758726 SCV004454317 benign Congenital glaucoma 2024-01-26 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing

The information on this website is not intended for direct diagnostic use or medical decision-making without review by a genetics professional. Individuals should not change their health behavior solely on the basis of information contained on this website. Neither the University of Utah nor the National Institutes of Health independently verfies the submitted information. If you have questions about the information contained on this website, please see a health care professional.