Total submissions: 5
Submitter | RCV | SCV | Clinical significance | Condition | Last evaluated | Review status | Method | Comment |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ambry Genetics | RCV000129947 | SCV000184766 | uncertain significance | Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome | 2022-01-12 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | The p.L952P variant (also known as c.2855T>C), located in coding exon 4 of the MSH6 gene, results from a T to C substitution at nucleotide position 2855. The leucine at codon 952 is replaced by proline, an amino acid with similar properties. This amino acid position is not well conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, the in silico prediction for this alteration is inconclusive. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. |
Invitae | RCV000629697 | SCV000750653 | likely benign | Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal neoplasms | 2022-11-08 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | |
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, |
RCV001582602 | SCV001821301 | uncertain significance | not specified | 2021-08-19 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Variant summary: MSH6 c.2855T>C (p.Leu952Pro) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 4e-06 in 250318 control chromosomes. The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. To our knowledge, no occurrence of c.2855T>C in individuals affected with Lynch Syndrome and no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. Two clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. Both laboratories classified the variant as uncertain significance. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as uncertain significance. |
All of Us Research Program, |
RCV003997536 | SCV004824883 | uncertain significance | Lynch syndrome | 2023-05-04 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | This missense variant replaces leucine with proline at codon 952 of the MSH6 protein. Computational prediction is inconclusive regarding the impact of this variant on protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold 0.5 < inconclusive < 0.7, PMID: 27666373). To our knowledge, functional studies have not been reported for this variant. This variant has not been reported in individuals affected with MSH6-related disorders in the literature. This variant has been identified in 2/281710 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. |
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, |
RCV000502711 | SCV000592615 | uncertain significance | not provided | no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | The MSH6 p.Leu952Pro variant was not identified in the literature nor was it identified in the dbSNP, COSMIC, InSiGHT Colon Cancer Gene Variant Database (LOVD), Zhejiang Colon Cancer Database (LOVD), GeneInsight - COGR database or UMD databases. The variant was identified in the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC) database (released Jan 13, 2015) in 1 of 120320 chromosomes (frequency: 0.8.31E-06) (or 1 individuals) from a population of European (Non-Finnish), and none from East Asian, Other, African, Latino, South Asian, or European (Finnish) individuals; and the ClinVar database (classification uncertain significance by Ambry Genetics); and in the Clinvitae database (classification uncertain significance).The p.Leu952 residue is not conserved in mammals and lower organisms, and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) provide inconsistent predictions regarding the impact to the protein; this information is not very predictive of pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information, the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time. This variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. |