Total submissions: 14
Submitter | RCV | SCV | Clinical significance | Condition | Last evaluated | Review status | Method | Comment |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Labcorp Genetics |
RCV001257068 | SCV000166225 | benign | Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal neoplasms | 2024-01-25 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | |
Ambry Genetics | RCV000132157 | SCV000187231 | benign | Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome | 2021-06-03 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. |
Gene |
RCV000588824 | SCV000211312 | likely benign | not provided | 2021-04-21 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 23047549, 28873162, 31386297, 31660093) |
Counsyl | RCV000408980 | SCV000488006 | uncertain significance | Lynch syndrome 5 | 2015-12-11 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | |
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, |
RCV000588824 | SCV000695839 | benign | not provided | 2016-04-29 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Variant summary: The variant of interest causes a missense change involving a conserved nucleotide with 4/5 in silico programs predicting a "benign" outcome, although these predictions have yet to be functionally assessed. The variant of interest was observed in the large, broad control population, ExAC, with an allele frequency of 107/119266 (1/1114), predominantly in the South Asian cohort, 106/16430 (1/154), which exceeds the predicted maximum expected allele frequency for a pathogenic MSH6 variant of 1/7037. Therefore, suggesting that the variant of interest is a common polymorphism found in population(s) of South Asian origin. The variant of interest was observed in affected individuals via a publication, although with limited information (ie lack of co-occurrence/co-segregation data). Multiple reputable clinical laboratories cite the variant with a classification of "uncertain significance," however, it should be noted that these classifications were evaluated previous to ExAC data being available. Therefore, taking all available lines of evidence into consideration, the variant of interest is classified as Benign. |
Color Diagnostics, |
RCV000132157 | SCV000902696 | benign | Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome | 2016-05-12 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | |
Mendelics | RCV000408980 | SCV001135829 | likely benign | Lynch syndrome 5 | 2019-05-28 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | |
Cancer Genomics Group, |
RCV001030498 | SCV001193652 | uncertain significance | Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome | 2019-05-01 | criteria provided, single submitter | research | |
Sema4, |
RCV000132157 | SCV002535794 | likely benign | Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome | 2021-10-24 | criteria provided, single submitter | curation | |
Myriad Genetics, |
RCV000408980 | SCV004019031 | benign | Lynch syndrome 5 | 2023-03-29 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | This variant is considered benign. This variant has been observed at a population frequency that is significantly greater than expected given the associated disease prevalence and penetrance. This variant is strongly associated with less severe personal and family histories of cancer, typical for individuals without pathogenic variants in this gene [PMID: 25085752]. |
Center for Genomic Medicine, |
RCV001796965 | SCV004024798 | benign | not specified | 2023-08-15 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | |
CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, |
RCV003492535 | SCV004239313 | likely benign | Breast and/or ovarian cancer | 2022-07-19 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | |
Prevention |
RCV004528840 | SCV000805875 | likely benign | MSH6-related disorder | 2020-07-29 | no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). |
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, |
RCV001355067 | SCV001549834 | benign | Carcinoma of colon | no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | The MSH6 p.Val1051Ile variant was identified in 2 of 3786 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.0005) from individuals or families with epithelial ovarian cancer (Pal 2012). The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs576269342) as "With Uncertain significance allele", ClinVar (classified as benign by Invitae and Integrated Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America; as likely benign by GeneDx; and as uncertain significance by three submitters), and Cosmic database (2x in upper aerodigestive tract tissue). The variant was not identified in COGR, MutDB, UMD-LSDB, Zhejiang University Database, Mismatch Repair Genes Variant Database, or Insight Hereditary Tumors Database. The variant was identified in control databases in 218 of 247410 chromosomes (1 homozygous) at a frequency of 0.0009 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: South Asian in 215 of 30590 chromosomes (freq: 0.007) and Other in 3 of 6076 chromosomes (freq: 0.0005); it was not observed in the Ashkenazi Jewish, African, East Asian, Finnish, European, or Latino populations. The p.Val1051 residue is conserved in mammals but not in more distantly related organisms and four out of five computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein; this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information, this variant meets our laboratory's criteria to be classified as benign. |