ClinVar Miner

Submissions for variant NM_000249.4(MLH1):c.191A>G (p.Asn64Ser)

gnomAD frequency: 0.00003  dbSNP: rs63750952
Minimum review status: Collection method:
Minimum conflict level:
ClinVar version:
Total submissions: 14
Download table as spreadsheet
Submitter RCV SCV Clinical significance Condition Last evaluated Review status Method Comment
GeneDx RCV000513562 SCV000211108 likely benign not provided 2020-10-21 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; Published functional studies are inconclusive: reduced MMR activity, no impact on nuclear localization, and conflicting results regarding mutator effect, PMS2 binding, MLH1 protein expression (Ellison 2004, Plotz 2006, Takahashi 2007, Wanat 2007, Hardt 2011, Bolz 2012, Drost 2018); Observed in individuals with MLH1-related cancers including segregation with disease in one family, as well as in individuals with melanoma (Wijnen 1997, Spaepen 2006, Hardt 2011, Shindo 2017, Yehia 2018); This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 17135187, 21404117, 23741719, 29684080, 17510385, 17210669, 25525159, 9311737, 22843852, 15475387, 26552419, 16736289, 24362816, 28767289, 30504929, 31697235, 31332305, 32719484, 30755392)
Invitae RCV000075426 SCV000218899 uncertain significance Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal neoplasms 2024-01-29 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing This sequence change replaces asparagine, which is neutral and polar, with serine, which is neutral and polar, at codon 64 of the MLH1 protein (p.Asn64Ser). This variant is present in population databases (rs63750952, gnomAD 0.006%). This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with colorectal, endometrial, pancreatic, ovarian cancer and/or Lynch syndrome (PMID: 9311737, 16736289, 21404117, 26552419, 28514183, 28767289, 28888541, 31332305). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 89947). Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) performed at Invitae indicates that this missense variant is expected to disrupt MLH1 protein function with a positive predictive value of 80%. Experimental studies have shown that this missense change affects MLH1 function (PMID: 17135187, 17510385, 21404117, 30504929). In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance.
Ambry Genetics RCV000217492 SCV000276267 uncertain significance Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome 2023-05-08 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing The p.N64S variant (also known as c.191A>G), located in coding exon 2 of the MLH1 gene, results from an A to G substitution at nucleotide position 191. The asparagine at codon 64 is replaced by serine, an amino acid with highly similar properties. This alteration has been identified in several colorectal cancer cohorts that are suspicious for Lynch syndrome and, in at least one case, the tumor retained expression of MLH1 and MSH2 on immunohistochemical staining (Wijnen J et al. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 1997 Aug;61:329-35; Spaepen M et al. Fam. Cancer 2006;5:179-89; Hardt K et al. Fam. Cancer 2011 Jun;10:273-84; Stojcev Z et al. Acta Biochim Pol, 2013 Jun;60:195-8). One report shows that this alteration segregates with 5 of 6 siblings affected with colorectal cancer (Spaepen M et al. Fam. Cancer 2006;5:179-89). In another report, this alteration was found to co-occur with MLH1 c.986A>C, a functionally validated splicing mutation, in a patient with three gastrointestinal primary tumors diagnosed at 47. The MLH1 p.N64S alteration was inherited from the proband's mother who was unaffected at age 71, and while the paternal family history met Amsterdam criteria, suggesting the father likely carried the MLH1 c.986A>C pathogenic mutation, the inheritance of this alteration was not confirmed (Hardt K et al. Fam. Cancer 2011 Jun;10:273-84). Numerous functional studies show reduced but not abolished function including yeast mutator assays, expression assays, in vitro mismatch repair assays and heterodimerization assays (Ellison AR et al. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004 Oct;32:5321-38; Plotz G et al. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006 Nov;34:6574-86; Takahashi M et al. Cancer Res. 2007 May;67:4595-604; Wanat JJ et al. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2007 Feb;16:445-52; Hardt K et al. Fam. Cancer 2011 Jun;10:273-84). This amino acid position is highly conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, the in silico prediction for this alteration is inconclusive. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear.
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen RCV000513562 SCV000609098 likely pathogenic not provided 2021-01-01 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
Counsyl RCV000490571 SCV000611601 uncertain significance Lynch syndrome 1 2017-06-29 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health RCV000217492 SCV000684783 uncertain significance Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome 2024-01-17 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing This missense variant replaces asparagine with serine at codon 64 of the MLH1 protein. Computational prediction suggests that this variant may have deleterious impact on protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold >= 0.7, PMID: 27666373). Functional studies have inconclusive results, with several showing this variant results in partial loss of mismatch repair function and moderately reduced protein stability and binding ability to PMS2 protein (PMID: 17135187, 17510385, 21404117, 30504929, 36054288). Another cell-based functional assay also demonstrated the variant resulted in partial protein stability, however, the variant also displayed positive damage response signaling and DNA repair function (PMID: 36054288). This variant has been reported in individuals from Lynch syndrome families (PMID: 9311737, 16736289, 21404117). In one of these families, two affected siblings were carriers of this variant but their affected sister with microsatellite instability-high tumor did not carry this variant (PMID: 16736289). Three unaffected siblings from this family did not carry this variant. In another family, this variant co-occurred in trans with a different pathogenic variant in the MLH1 gene (PMID: 21404117, 31332305). This variant has also been reported in individuals affected with endometrial cancer (PMID: 26552419) or pancreatic cancer (PMID: 28767289). In a large breast cancer case-control study, this variant was observed in 6/60466 cases and 5/53461 unaffected controls (PMID: 33471991) This variant has been identified in 10/282844 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance.
Center for Personalized Medicine, Children's Hospital Los Angeles RCV000584818 SCV000692543 uncertain significance Global developmental delay; Choreoathetosis; Aqueductal stenosis 2016-03-15 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
Mendelics RCV000708912 SCV000837994 uncertain significance Lynch syndrome 2018-07-02 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano RCV000513562 SCV000889392 uncertain significance not provided 2023-02-06 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing The frequency of this variant in the general population, 0.00007 (9/129152 chromosomes, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org), is uninformative in assessment of its pathogenicity. In the published literature, the variant has been reported in individuals/families with colorectal cancer (PMIDs: 21404117 (2011), 16736289 (2006), and 9311737 (1997)), endometrial cancer (PMID: 26552419 (2015)), breast cancer (PMID: 33471991 (2021); LOVD3 Shared (https://databases.lovd.nl/shared/)), and also in one case of pancreatic cancer (PMID: 28767289 (2017)). In addition, this variant has been reported in healthy control individuals (PMID: 33471991 (2021); LOVD3 Shared (https://databases.lovd.nl/shared/)). Functional studies have observed the variant having intermediate levels of MLH1 expression, mismatch repair activity, and PMS2 interaction (PMIDs: 30504929 (2018), 26552419 (2015), 22843852 (2012), 21404117 (2011), 17510385 (2007), 17210669 (2007), 17135187 (2006), and 15475387 (2004)). Analysis of this variant using bioinformatics tools for the prediction of the effect of amino acid changes on protein structure and function yielded predictions that this variant is damaging. Based on the available information, we are unable to determine the clinical significance of this variant.
Institute of Human Genetics, University of Leipzig Medical Center RCV001262297 SCV001440111 uncertain significance Muir-Torré syndrome 2019-01-01 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
Institute for Clinical Genetics, University Hospital TU Dresden, University Hospital TU Dresden RCV000513562 SCV002009370 uncertain significance not provided 2021-11-03 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
MGZ Medical Genetics Center RCV002288569 SCV002581763 uncertain significance Colorectal cancer, hereditary nonpolyposis, type 2 2022-08-08 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
Myriad Genetics, Inc. RCV002288569 SCV004018166 likely benign Colorectal cancer, hereditary nonpolyposis, type 2 2023-03-15 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing This variant is considered likely benign. This variant is strongly associated with less severe personal and family histories of cancer, typical for individuals without pathogenic variants in this gene [PMID: 25085752].
Baylor Genetics RCV002288569 SCV004195090 uncertain significance Colorectal cancer, hereditary nonpolyposis, type 2 2023-09-29 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing

The information on this website is not intended for direct diagnostic use or medical decision-making without review by a genetics professional. Individuals should not change their health behavior solely on the basis of information contained on this website. Neither the University of Utah nor the National Institutes of Health independently verfies the submitted information. If you have questions about the information contained on this website, please see a health care professional.