Total submissions: 6
Submitter | RCV | SCV | Clinical significance | Condition | Last evaluated | Review status | Method | Comment |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ambry Genetics | RCV000219171 | SCV000276373 | uncertain significance | Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome | 2023-09-20 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | The p.L642V variant (also known as c.1924C>G), located in coding exon 17 of the MLH1 gene, results from a C to G substitution at nucleotide position 1924. The leucine at codon 642 is replaced by valine, an amino acid with highly similar properties. This amino acid position is highly conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, the in silico prediction for this alteration is inconclusive. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. |
Invitae | RCV000797456 | SCV000937013 | uncertain significance | Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal neoplasms | 2023-10-25 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | This sequence change replaces leucine, which is neutral and non-polar, with valine, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 642 of the MLH1 protein (p.Leu642Val). This variant is not present in population databases (gnomAD no frequency). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with MLH1-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 232280). Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) has been performed at Invitae for this missense variant, however the output from this modeling did not meet the statistical confidence thresholds required to predict the impact of this variant on MLH1 protein function. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. |
Color Diagnostics, |
RCV000219171 | SCV001344072 | uncertain significance | Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome | 2023-05-11 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | This missense variant replaces leucine with valine at codon 642 of the MLH1 protein. Computational prediction is inconclusive regarding the impact of this variant on protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold 0.5 < inconclusive < 0.7, PMID: 27666373). To our knowledge, functional studies have not been reported for this variant. This variant has not been reported in individuals affected with MLH1-related disorders in the literature. This variant has not been identified in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. |
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, |
RCV002222451 | SCV002500071 | uncertain significance | not specified | 2022-03-04 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | |
Sema4, |
RCV000219171 | SCV002528695 | uncertain significance | Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome | 2021-04-05 | criteria provided, single submitter | curation | |
All of Us Research Program, |
RCV003997957 | SCV004843238 | uncertain significance | Lynch syndrome | 2024-01-11 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | This missense variant replaces leucine with valine at codon 642 of the MLH1 protein. Computational prediction tool is inconclusive regarding the impact of this variant on protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold 0.5 < inconclusive < 0.7, PMID: 27666373). Splice site prediction tools suggest that this variant may not impact RNA splicing. To our knowledge, functional studies have not been performed for this variant. This variant has not been reported in individuals affected with hereditary cancer in the literature. This variant has not been identified in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. |