Total submissions: 4
Submitter | RCV | SCV | Clinical significance | Condition | Last evaluated | Review status | Method | Comment |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ambry Genetics | RCV000221816 | SCV000277616 | likely benign | Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome | 2020-12-16 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. |
Gene |
RCV000479027 | SCV000567668 | uncertain significance | not provided | 2017-02-22 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | This variant is denoted MLH1 c.43G>A at the cDNA level, p.Val15Met (V15M) at the protein level, and results in the change of a Valine to a Methionine (GTG>ATG). This variant has not, to our knowledge, been published in the literature as pathogenic or benign. MLH1 Val15Met was not observed in approximately 6,500 individuals of European and African American ancestry in the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project, suggesting it is not a common benign variant in these populations. Since Valine and Methionine share similar properties, this is considered a conservative amino acid substitution. MLH1 Val15Met occurs at a position that is conserved across species and is not located in a known functional domain. In silico analyses are inconsistent regarding the effect this variant may have on protein structure and function. Based on currently available evidence, it is unclear whether MLH1 Val15Met is a pathogenic or benign variant. We consider it to be a variant of uncertain significance. |
Invitae | RCV000527289 | SCV000625163 | uncertain significance | Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal neoplasms | 2023-03-20 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with clinical features of MLH1-related conditions (Invitae). In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) performed at Invitae indicates that this missense variant is expected to disrupt MLH1 protein function. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 233273). This missense change has been observed on the opposite chromosome (in trans) from a pathogenic variant in MLH1 in at least one individual (Invitae), which suggests that this variant may not be disease-causing. This variant is not present in population databases (gnomAD no frequency). This sequence change replaces valine, which is neutral and non-polar, with methionine, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 15 of the MLH1 protein (p.Val15Met). |
All of Us Research Program, |
RCV003998042 | SCV004824599 | uncertain significance | Lynch syndrome | 2023-06-26 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | This missense variant replaces valine with methionine at codon 15 of the MLH1 protein. Computational prediction suggests that this variant may have deleterious impact on protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold >= 0.7, PMID: 27666373). To our knowledge, functional studies have not been reported for this variant. This variant has been reported in an individual affected with MLH1-related conditions who also carried a pathogenic variant in the MLH1 gene in trans that could explain the observed phenotype (ClinVar SCV000625163.4). This variant has not been identified in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. |