ClinVar Miner

Submissions for variant NM_000249.4(MLH1):c.885-5G>T

gnomAD frequency: 0.00001  dbSNP: rs267607802
Minimum review status: Collection method:
Minimum conflict level:
ClinVar version:
Total submissions: 12
Download table as spreadsheet
Submitter RCV SCV Clinical significance Condition Last evaluated Review status Method Comment
International Society for Gastrointestinal Hereditary Tumours (InSiGHT) RCV000075917 SCV000106936 likely benign Lynch syndrome 2013-09-05 reviewed by expert panel research Intronic substitution with no effect on splicing, tested with NMD inhibitor
GeneDx RCV000585990 SCV000211137 likely benign not provided 2021-02-18 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 12624141, 18561205, 22949379)
Ambry Genetics RCV000160558 SCV000216095 likely benign Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome 2018-06-13 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity.
Invitae RCV001080675 SCV000253145 likely benign Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal neoplasms 2024-01-30 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health RCV000160558 SCV000684879 likely benign Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome 2022-01-01 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp RCV000417381 SCV000696187 likely benign not specified 2023-02-06 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing Variant summary: MLH1 c.885-5G>T alters a non-conserved nucleotide located close to a canonical splice site and therefore could affect mRNA splicing, leading to a significantly altered protein sequence. 4/4 computational tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Consistently, functional analysis using the pCAS ex vivo splicing assay and RNA analysis demonstrated this variant had no effect (Tournier_2008).The variant allele was found at a frequency of 2e-05 in 251406 control chromosomes. The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. c.885-5G>T has been reported in the literature in at-least one proband referred to a French family cancer clinic and satisfying at least one of the modified Amsterdam criteria (Parc_2003). These report(s) do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer/Lynch syndrome. Seven clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. All laboratories classified the variant as benign/likely benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign.
Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano RCV000585990 SCV000889408 likely benign not provided 2022-09-26 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
Mendelics RCV000987159 SCV001136390 likely benign Colorectal cancer, hereditary nonpolyposis, type 2 2019-05-28 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
Sema4, Sema4 RCV000160558 SCV002528786 likely benign Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome 2020-12-18 criteria provided, single submitter curation
CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario RCV003492418 SCV004239267 likely benign Breast and/or ovarian cancer 2023-06-05 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences RCV003894922 SCV004713564 likely benign MLH1-related condition 2023-01-11 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications).
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System RCV000585990 SCV001549002 likely benign not provided no assertion criteria provided clinical testing The MLH1 c.885-5G>T variant was identified in 1 of 872 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.001) from French individuals or families with HNPCC (Parc 2003). The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs267607802) as “With other allele”, ClinVar (classified as likely benign by an InSiGHT expert panel (2013), GeneDx, Invitae, Ambry Genetics, and 3 other submitters; and as benign by Color), and UMD-LSDB (classified neutral). The variant was identified in control databases in 5 of 246182 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.00002 (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017), observed in the following populations: Latino in 1 of 33582 chromosomes (freq: 0.00003) and European Non-Finnish in 4 of 111640 chromosomes (freq: 0.00004), while it was not observed in the African, Other, Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, European Finnish, or South Asian populations. The c.885-5G>T variant is located in the 3' splice region but does not affect the invariant -1 and -2 positions. However, positions -3 and -5 to -12 are part of the splicing consensus sequence and variants involving these positions sometimes affect splicing and 1 of 4 in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) predict a greater than 10% difference in splicing; this is not very predictive of pathogenicity. However, one study using both a minigene assay and RT-PCR on patient RNA showed that this variant has no effect on splicing (Tournier 2008). In summary, based on the above information, the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign.

The information on this website is not intended for direct diagnostic use or medical decision-making without review by a genetics professional. Individuals should not change their health behavior solely on the basis of information contained on this website. Neither the University of Utah nor the National Institutes of Health independently verfies the submitted information. If you have questions about the information contained on this website, please see a health care professional.