ClinVar Miner

Submissions for variant NM_000251.3(MSH2):c.1661+2T>C

dbSNP: rs1553366680
Minimum review status: Collection method:
Minimum conflict level:
ClinVar version:
Total submissions: 4
Download table as spreadsheet
Submitter RCV SCV Clinical significance Condition Last evaluated Review status Method Comment
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp RCV000559692 SCV000625292 pathogenic Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal neoplasms 2022-11-15 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing This sequence change affects a donor splice site in intron 10 of the MSH2 gene. RNA analysis indicates that disruption of this splice site induces altered splicing and may result in an absent or disrupted protein product. This variant is not present in population databases (gnomAD no frequency). Disruption of this splice site has been observed in individuals with Lynch syndrome (PMID: 12624141, 16034045, 16142001, 17569143, 21642682). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 455513). Studies have shown that disruption of this splice site results in activation of a cryptic splice site and skipping of exon 10 and introduces a premature termination codon (Invitae). The resulting mRNA is expected to undergo nonsense-mediated decay. For these reasons, this variant has been classified as Pathogenic.
Ambry Genetics RCV002404370 SCV002707539 likely pathogenic Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome 2022-02-23 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing The c.1661+2T>C intronic variant results from a T to C substitution two nucleotides after coding exon 10 in the MSH2 gene. This variant has been identified in at least one individual whose Lynch syndrome-related tumor demonstrated loss of MSH2 and MSH6 expression by IHC (Ambry internal data). This variant is considered to be rare based on population cohorts in the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). This nucleotide position is highly conserved in available vertebrate species. In silico splice site analysis predicts that this alteration will weaken the native splice donor site. Based on the majority of available evidence to date, this variant is likely to be pathogenic.
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp RCV002509421 SCV002819563 likely pathogenic Hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer 2022-12-15 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing Variant summary: MSH2 c.1661+2T>C is located in a canonical splice-site and is predicted to affect mRNA splicing resulting in a significantly altered protein due to either exon skipping, shortening, or inclusion of intronic material. Several computational tools predict a significant impact on normal splicing: Three predict the variant abolishes a canonical 5' splicing donor site. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. The variant was absent in 250972 control chromosomes. To our knowledge, no occurrence of c.1661+2T>C in individuals affected with Lynch Syndrome and no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. Two clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014, and both classified the variant as likely pathogenic. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely pathogenic.
Myriad Genetics, Inc. RCV003449535 SCV004186947 pathogenic Lynch syndrome 1 2023-08-03 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing This variant is considered pathogenic. This variant occurs within a consensus splice junction and is predicted to result in abnormal mRNA splicing of either an out-of-frame exon or an in-frame exon necessary for protein stability and/or normal function. mRNA analysis has demonstrated abnormal mRNA splicing occurs [PMID: 18561205].

The information on this website is not intended for direct diagnostic use or medical decision-making without review by a genetics professional. Individuals should not change their health behavior solely on the basis of information contained on this website. Neither the University of Utah nor the National Institutes of Health independently verfies the submitted information. If you have questions about the information contained on this website, please see a health care professional.