ClinVar Miner

Submissions for variant NM_000251.3(MSH2):c.182A>C (p.Gln61Pro)

dbSNP: rs587779113
Minimum review status: Collection method:
Minimum conflict level:
ClinVar version:
Total submissions: 9
Download table as spreadsheet
Submitter RCV SCV Clinical significance Condition Last evaluated Review status Method Comment
GeneDx RCV001703978 SCV000730543 likely benign not provided 2020-10-26 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 16995940, 17720936, 26333163, 25133505, 18383312, 20176959, 31159747, 32957588)
Counsyl RCV000662761 SCV000785555 uncertain significance Lynch syndrome 1 2017-09-13 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
GeneKor MSA RCV000708715 SCV000822049 uncertain significance Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome 2018-08-01 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health RCV000708715 SCV000908272 uncertain significance Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome 2021-03-19 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing This missense variant replaces glutamine with proline at codon 61 of the MSH2 protein. Computational prediction suggests that this variant may have deleterious impact on protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold >= 0.7, PMID: 27666373). Splice site prediction tools suggest that this variant may not impact RNA splicing. Experimental studies have reported this variant protein to be functional in yeast mutator and protein binding assays (PMID: 17720936, 20176959). This variant has been reported in an individual affected with ovarian and colorectal cancer (PMID: 25133505). This variant has been identified in 1/232376 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance.
Ambry Genetics RCV000708715 SCV001173915 likely benign Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome 2020-03-04 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity.
Invitae RCV001218170 SCV001390042 likely benign Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal neoplasms 2023-12-25 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
Myriad Genetics, Inc. RCV000662761 SCV004018375 likely benign Lynch syndrome 1 2023-03-22 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing This variant is considered likely benign. This variant has been observed in conjunction with multiple pathogenic variants, reducing the likelihood this variant itself is pathogenic.
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp RCV003317078 SCV004020513 uncertain significance not specified 2023-06-07 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing Variant summary: MSH2 c.182A>C (p.Gln61Pro) results in a non-conservative amino acid change located in the N-terminal domain (IPR007695) of the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 4.3e-06 in 232376 control chromosomes (gnomAD). The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. c.182A>C has been reported in the literature in an individual affected with ovarian cancer and colorectal cancer who fulfilled at least one of the revised Bethesda guidelines and in affected individuals undergoing genetic testing for hereditary cancers (e.g. Tsaousis_2019, Germani_2020, Pemov_2021). These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Lynch Syndrome. Functional studies examining the variant in a yeast model system and using a DNA mismatch repair proficiency screen showed no damaging effect of this variant (Gammie_2007, Jia_2021). The following publications have been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 17720936, 32957588, 33357406, 25133505, 34964002, 31159747). Six submitters have provided clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 and classified the variant as either VUS (n=3) or likely benign (n=3). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as uncertain significance.
All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health RCV003997154 SCV004831983 uncertain significance Lynch syndrome 2023-10-30 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing This missense variant replaces glutamine with proline at codon 61 of the MSH2 protein. Computational prediction suggests that this variant may have deleterious impact on protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold >= 0.7, PMID: 27666373). Splice site prediction tools suggest that this variant may not impact RNA splicing. Experimental studies have reported this variant protein to be functional in yeast mutator and protein binding assays (PMID: 17720936, 20176959). This variant has been reported in an individual affected with ovarian and colorectal cancer (PMID: 25133505). This variant has been identified in 1/232376 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance.

The information on this website is not intended for direct diagnostic use or medical decision-making without review by a genetics professional. Individuals should not change their health behavior solely on the basis of information contained on this website. Neither the University of Utah nor the National Institutes of Health independently verfies the submitted information. If you have questions about the information contained on this website, please see a health care professional.