ClinVar Miner

Submissions for variant NM_000251.3(MSH2):c.206C>T (p.Pro69Leu)

dbSNP: rs983555044
Minimum review status: Collection method:
Minimum conflict level:
ClinVar version:
Total submissions: 5
Download table as spreadsheet
Submitter RCV SCV Clinical significance Condition Last evaluated Review status Method Comment
Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano RCV000507013 SCV000601453 uncertain significance not specified 2017-05-31 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp RCV001229452 SCV001401897 uncertain significance Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal neoplasms 2024-04-24 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing This sequence change replaces proline, which is neutral and non-polar, with leucine, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 69 of the MSH2 protein (p.Pro69Leu). This variant is not present in population databases (gnomAD no frequency). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with MSH2-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 439189). Advanced modeling performed at Invitae incorporating data from internal and/or published experimental studies (PMID: 33357406) indicates that this missense variant is not expected to disrupt MSH2 function with a negative predictive value of 80%. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance.
GeneDx RCV001764502 SCV002000828 uncertain significance not provided 2020-02-25 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing Not observed in large population cohorts (Lek et al., 2016); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge
Ambry Genetics RCV004023418 SCV005033605 uncertain significance Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome 2023-10-11 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing The p.P69L variant (also known as c.206C>T), located in coding exon 1 of the MSH2 gene, results from a C to T substitution at nucleotide position 206. The proline at codon 69 is replaced by leucine, an amino acid with similar properties. In a massively parallel cell-based functional assay testing susceptibility to a DNA damaging agent, 6-thioguanine (6-TG), this variant was reported to be functionally neutral (Jia X et al. Am J Hum Genet, 2021 Jan;108:163-175). This amino acid position is not well conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, the in silico prediction for this alteration is inconclusive. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear.
All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health RCV004806381 SCV005427935 uncertain significance Lynch syndrome 2024-03-24 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing This missense variant replaces proline with leucine at codon 69 of the MSH2 protein. Computational prediction suggests that this variant may not impact protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold <= 0.5, PMID: 27666373). This variant does not impact MSH2 function in a 6-thioguanine sensitivity assay in haploid human cells (internally defined LOF score threshold <= -1.32, PMID: 33357406). To our knowledge, this variant has not been reported in individuals affected with MSH2-related disorders in the literature. This variant has not been identified in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance.

The information on this website is not intended for direct diagnostic use or medical decision-making without review by a genetics professional. Individuals should not change their health behavior solely on the basis of information contained on this website. Neither the University of Utah nor the National Institutes of Health independently verfies the submitted information. If you have questions about the information contained on this website, please see a health care professional.