ClinVar Miner

Submissions for variant NM_000251.3(MSH2):c.2362A>C (p.Thr788Pro)

gnomAD frequency: 0.00002  dbSNP: rs774440277
Minimum review status: Collection method:
Minimum conflict level:
ClinVar version:
Total submissions: 11
Download table as spreadsheet
Submitter RCV SCV Clinical significance Condition Last evaluated Review status Method Comment
GeneDx RCV000585967 SCV000292626 uncertain significance not provided 2023-03-20 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing Not observed at significant frequency in large population cohorts (gnomAD); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; Observed in individuals with breast or renal cancer and also in unaffected controls (Yehia et al., 2018; Dorling et al., 2021); Published functional studies suggest no damaging effect: performed similar to wild type in an assay measuring resistance to 6-TG (Jia et al., 2020); This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 18822302, 21120944, 30029678, 33471991, 33357406, 29684080)
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp RCV000456146 SCV000548216 likely benign Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal neoplasms 2025-01-21 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
Ambry Genetics RCV000569234 SCV000669733 uncertain significance Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome 2024-04-23 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing The p.T788P variant (also known as c.2362A>C), located in coding exon 14 of the MSH2 gene, results from an A to C substitution at nucleotide position 2362. The threonine at codon 788 is replaced by proline, an amino acid with highly similar properties. In a massively parallel cell-based functional assay testing susceptibility to a DNA damaging agent, 6-thioguanine (6-TG), this variant was reported to be functionally neutral (Jia X et al. Am J Hum Genet, 2021 01;108:163-175). This amino acid position is highly conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be deleterious by in silico analysis. Based on the available evidence, the clinical significance of this variant remains unclear.
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health RCV000569234 SCV000685037 uncertain significance Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome 2023-02-28 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing This missense variant replaces threonine with proline at codon 788 of the MSH2 protein. Computational prediction is inconclusive regarding the impact of this variant on protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold 0.5 < inconclusive < 0.7, PMID: 27666373). This variant does not impact MSH2 function in a 6-thioguanine sensitivity assay in haploid human cells (internally defined LOF score threshold <= -1.32, PMID: 33357406). This variant has been reported in individuals affected with kidney renal cell carcinoma (PMID: 29684080). This variant has been identified in 3/282838 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance.
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp RCV001526856 SCV000696247 uncertain significance not specified 2021-06-01 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing Variant summary: MSH2 c.2362A>C (p.Thr788Pro) results in a non-conservative amino acid change located in the C-terminal domain (IPR000432) of the encoded protein sequence. Five of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 8e-06 in 251444 control chromosomes (gnomAD). The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. To our knowledge, the variant, c.2362A>C, has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with colorectal cancer or other tumor phenotypes that belong to the Lynch Syndrome tumor spectrum. On the other hand, the variant was reported in the literature in a patient affected with pulmonary arterial hypertension (Zhu_2018), and in multiple individuals affected with breast cancer, but also in in several healthy controls (Dorling_2021). These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Five other clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. All laboratories classified the variant as uncertain significance. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as uncertain significance.
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen RCV000585967 SCV001152283 uncertain significance not provided 2017-08-01 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital RCV001526856 SCV002552261 uncertain significance not specified 2023-08-15 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
Baylor Genetics RCV003469179 SCV004194502 uncertain significance Lynch syndrome 1 2024-01-06 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic RCV000585967 SCV004224907 uncertain significance not provided 2022-07-19 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing PP3, PM2
Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center RCV000585967 SCV001918633 uncertain significance not provided no assertion criteria provided clinical testing
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ RCV000585967 SCV001957558 uncertain significance not provided no assertion criteria provided clinical testing

The information on this website is not intended for direct diagnostic use or medical decision-making without review by a genetics professional. Individuals should not change their health behavior solely on the basis of information contained on this website. Neither the University of Utah nor the National Institutes of Health independently verfies the submitted information. If you have questions about the information contained on this website, please see a health care professional.