ClinVar Miner

Submissions for variant NM_000251.3(MSH2):c.2635-1G>T

dbSNP: rs267608020
Minimum review status: Collection method:
Minimum conflict level:
ClinVar version:
Total submissions: 4
Download table as spreadsheet
Submitter RCV SCV Clinical significance Condition Last evaluated Review status Method Comment
International Society for Gastrointestinal Hereditary Tumours (InSiGHT) RCV000076525 SCV000107556 likely pathogenic Lynch syndrome 2019-06-21 reviewed by expert panel curation Interrupts canonical acceptor splice site
Invitae RCV000629741 SCV000750697 pathogenic Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal neoplasms 2023-10-23 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing This sequence change affects an acceptor splice site in intron 15 of the MSH2 gene. RNA analysis indicates that disruption of this splice site induces altered splicing and likely disrupts the C-terminus of the protein. This variant is not present in population databases (gnomAD no frequency). Disruption of this splice site has been observed in individuals with clinical features of Lynch syndrome (PMID: 2624141, 15849733, 21286823, 27601186, 29690800; Invitae). It has also been observed to segregate with disease in related individuals. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 91023). Variants that disrupt the consensus splice site are a relatively common cause of aberrant splicing (PMID: 17576681, 9536098). Studies have shown that disruption of this splice site results in the deletion of the first four nucleotides of exon 16 and introduces a new termination codon (PMID: 31332305). However the mRNA is not expected to undergo nonsense-mediated decay. For these reasons, this variant has been classified as Pathogenic.
Ambry Genetics RCV002426638 SCV002741269 likely pathogenic Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome 2022-08-19 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing The c.2635-1G>T intronic variant results from a G to T substitution one nucleotide upstream from coding exon 16 of the MSH2 gene. In a study of 1,721 German probands suspected of HNPCC/Lynch syndrome, this alteration was detected in one family that either met Bethesda criteria or Amsterdam II criteria (excluding the age criterion) (Mangold E et al. Int. J. Cancer, 2005 Sep;116:692-702). This nucleotide position is highly conserved in available vertebrate species. This variant was not reported in population-based cohorts in the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). This alteration has been classified as likely pathogenic using the following lines of evidence: in silico prediction models, segregation with disease, clinical phenotype including tumor characteristics, mutation co-occurrence, and functional studies (Thompson BA et al. Hum. Mutat. 2013 Jan;34:200-9; Thompson BA et al. Nat. Genet. 2014 Feb;46:107-15; available at [www.insight-group.org/variants/classifications/]). RNA studies demonstrated that this alteration induced a deletion of the first four nucleotides of exon 16 with 50% intensity (Morak M et al. Eur J Hum Genet, 2019 12;27:1808-1820). In silico splice site analysis predicts that this alteration will weaken the native splice acceptor site and will result in the creation or strengthening of a novel splice acceptor site. Alterations that disrupt the canonical splice site are expected to cause aberrant splicing, resulting in an abnormal protein. As such, this variant is likely to be pathogenic.
Myriad Genetics, Inc. RCV003452929 SCV004186672 likely pathogenic Lynch syndrome 1 2023-08-10 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing This variant is considered likely pathogenic. This variant occurs within a consensus splice junction and is predicted to result in abnormal mRNA splicing of either an out-of-frame exon or an in-frame exon necessary for protein stability and/or normal function.

The information on this website is not intended for direct diagnostic use or medical decision-making without review by a genetics professional. Individuals should not change their health behavior solely on the basis of information contained on this website. Neither the University of Utah nor the National Institutes of Health independently verfies the submitted information. If you have questions about the information contained on this website, please see a health care professional.