ClinVar Miner

Submissions for variant NM_000256.3(MYBPC3):c.3362G>A (p.Arg1121His)

gnomAD frequency: 0.00001  dbSNP: rs397516018
Minimum review status: Collection method:
Minimum conflict level:
ClinVar version:
Total submissions: 8
Download table as spreadsheet
Submitter RCV SCV Clinical significance Condition Last evaluated Review status Method Comment
GeneDx RCV000035584 SCV000208393 likely benign not specified 2017-02-02 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease.
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina RCV001105975 SCV001262999 uncertain significance Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 4 2018-01-13 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease.
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina RCV001105976 SCV001263000 benign Left ventricular noncompaction 10 2018-01-13 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease.
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health RCV001176064 SCV001339897 likely benign Cardiomyopathy 2020-12-23 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
Invitae RCV002054566 SCV002412558 likely benign Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 2022-10-07 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
Revvity Omics, Revvity RCV000786362 SCV003817158 uncertain significance not provided 2020-11-17 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine RCV000035584 SCV000059234 uncertain significance not specified 2008-03-01 no assertion criteria provided clinical testing
Stanford Center for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Stanford University RCV000786362 SCV000925158 uncertain significance not provided 2016-09-01 no assertion criteria provided provider interpretation Genetic testing: The patient had genetic testing with the GeneDx laboratory with their comprehensive cardiomyopathy panel. The test included 76 genes associated with various hereditary cardiomyopathies: ABCC9, ACTC (ACTC1), ACTN2, ANKRD1, BAG3, BRAF, CAV3, CRYAB, CSRP3, DES, DMD, DSC2, DSG2, DSP, DTNA, EMD, FKTN, GATAD1, GLA, HRAS, ILK, JPH2, JUP, KRAS, LAMA4, LAMP2, LDB3 (ZASP), LMNA, MAP2K1, MAP2K2, MTND1, MTND5, MTND6, MTTD, MTTG, MTTH, MTTI, MTTK, MTTL1, MTTL2, MTTM, MTTQ, MTTS1, MTTS2, MYBPC3, MYH7, MYL2, MYL3, MYLK2, MYOZ2, MYPN, NEBL, NEXN, NRAS, PDLIM3, PKP2, PLN, PRKAG2, PTPN11, RAF1, RBM20, RYR2, SCN5A, SGCD, SOS1, TAZ, TCAP, TMEM43,TMPO, TNNC1, TNNI3, TNNT2, TPM1, TTN, TTR, VCL. Analysis included both sequencing and array-based comparative genome hybridization to look for duplications and deletions (excluding mitochondrial genes, FKTN, GATAD1) Results reported on October 13, 2016 showed that a variant was found (see report below): p.Arg1121His (c.3362G>A) in the MYBPC3 gene (NM_000256.3) Given a lack of case data we consider this variant a variant of unknown significance and we do not feel it is suitable for assessing risk in healthy relatives ("predictive genetic testing"). This variant has been reported twice in Clinvar. This change is a conservative amino acid substitution which is not likely to impact secondary protein structure as these residues share the same properties. In silico analysis with PolyPhen-2 predicts the variant to be benign (HumVar = 0.011). The Arg at codon 1121 is not well conserved across species (histadine is the natural amino acid at this position in elephants and cows). No other variant have been reported in cardiomyopathy patients at this position, but there have been pathogenic missense variants in areas near this variant (F1113I, V1115I, C1124R, V1125M). There are 13 individuals with variation at codon 1121 listed in the Exome Aggregation Consortium dataset (http://exac.broadinstitute.org/), which currently includes variant calls on ~64,000 individuals of European, African, Latino and Asian descent (as of September 1, 2016). 11 individuals have the same p.Arg1121His change while 2 individuals have a p.Arg1121Cys. The average coverage at that site in ExAC is around 28x.

The information on this website is not intended for direct diagnostic use or medical decision-making without review by a genetics professional. Individuals should not change their health behavior solely on the basis of information contained on this website. Neither the University of Utah nor the National Institutes of Health independently verfies the submitted information. If you have questions about the information contained on this website, please see a health care professional.