Total submissions: 2
Submitter | RCV | SCV | Clinical significance | Condition | Last evaluated | Review status | Method | Comment |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gene |
RCV000493336 | SCV000581822 | uncertain significance | not provided | 2017-05-01 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | The E1624D variant has not been published as pathogenic or been reported as benign to our knowledge. The E1624D variant is not observed in large population cohorts (Lek et al., 2016; 1000 Genomes Consortium et al., 2015; Exome Variant Server). This substitution occurs at a position that is conserved across species. The majority (2 out of 3) of in silico analyses predicts this variant is probably damaging to the protein structure/function. Nevertheless, the E1624D variant is a conservative amino acid substitution, which is not likely to impact secondary protein structure as these residues share similar properties. |
Ambry Genetics | RCV000618238 | SCV000740267 | uncertain significance | Cardiovascular phenotype | 2017-12-08 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | The p.E1624D variant (also known as c.4872G>T), located in coding exon 32 of the MYH7 gene, results from a G to T substitution at nucleotide position 4872. The glutamic acid at codon 1624 is replaced by aspartic acid, an amino acid with highly similar properties. This amino acid position is highly conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, the in silico prediction for this alteration is inconclusive. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. |