ClinVar Miner

Submissions for variant NM_000322.5(PRPH2):c.828+3A>T

gnomAD frequency: 0.00001  dbSNP: rs281865373
Minimum review status: Collection method:
Minimum conflict level:
ClinVar version:
Total submissions: 16
Download table as spreadsheet
Submitter RCV SCV Clinical significance Condition Last evaluated Review status Method Comment
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) RCV000085026 SCV000227094 pathogenic not provided 2015-03-26 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
GeneDx RCV000085026 SCV000490745 pathogenic not provided 2023-04-10 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing Published functional studies demonstrate abnormal gene splicing (Shankar et al., 2015); In silico analysis supports a deleterious effect on splicing; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 11704030, 32531846, 25525159, 25082885, 11139241, 20861475, 32037395, 34758253, 25675413, 26842753)
Invitae RCV001047656 SCV001211626 pathogenic PRPH2-Related Disorders 2024-01-26 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing This sequence change falls in intron 2 of the PRPH2 gene. It does not directly change the encoded amino acid sequence of the PRPH2 protein. RNA analysis indicates that this variant induces altered splicing and likely disrupts the C-terminus of the protein. This variant is present in population databases (rs281865373, gnomAD 0.001%). This variant has been observed in individuals with autosomal dominant retinal disease in many families and may be a founder variant (PMID: 11139241, 25675413, 26842753). It is commonly reported in individuals of European ancestry (PMID: 11139241, 25675413, 26842753). This variant is also known as RDS IVS2+3A>T. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 98713). Variants that disrupt the consensus splice site are a relatively common cause of aberrant splicing (PMID: 17576681, 9536098). Studies have shown that this variant results in inclusion of part of intron 2 and introduces a new termination codon (PMID: 25675413). However the mRNA is not expected to undergo nonsense-mediated decay. For these reasons, this variant has been classified as Pathogenic.
Blueprint Genetics RCV001073686 SCV001239241 pathogenic Retinal dystrophy 2019-08-15 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
NEI Ophthalmic Genomics Laboratory, National Institutes of Health RCV001250344 SCV001424664 pathogenic Stargardt disease 2020-01-07 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing The variant NM_000322.4:c.828+3A>T in the PRPH2 gene has been previously studied(PMIDs 11139241, 11704030, 25675413, 25525159, 26842753). We found this variant in 36 patient(s) in a PRPH2 cohort study (Reeves et al. 2020). This variant is listed in dbSNP and/or HGMD (rs281865373,CS010139). It is present in gnomAD browser (AF 0.00000429). It is enriched in the PRPH2 disease cohort. We invoked ACMG criteria [PS4, PP1-S, PM2, PP3, PP5] and classified NM_000322.4:c.828+3A>T in the PRPH2 gene as a Pathogenic mutation.
NEI Ophthalmic Genomics Laboratory, National Institutes of Health RCV001250345 SCV001424665 pathogenic Choroideremia 2020-01-07 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing The variant NM_000322.4:c.828+3A>T in the PRPH2 gene has been previously studied(PMIDs 11139241, 11704030, 25675413, 25525159, 26842753). We found this variant in 36 patient(s) in a PRPH2 cohort study (Reeves et al. 2020). This variant is listed in dbSNP and/or HGMD (rs281865373,CS010139). It is present in gnomAD browser (AF 0.00000429). It is enriched in the PRPH2 disease cohort. We invoked ACMG criteria [PS4, PP1-S, PM2, PP3, PP5] and classified NM_000322.4:c.828+3A>T in the PRPH2 gene as a Pathogenic mutation.
NEI Ophthalmic Genomics Laboratory, National Institutes of Health RCV001250346 SCV001424666 pathogenic Patterned dystrophy of the retinal pigment epithelium 2020-01-07 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing The variant NM_000322.4:c.828+3A>T in the PRPH2 gene has been previously studied(PMIDs 11139241, 11704030, 25675413, 25525159, 26842753). We found this variant in 36 patient(s) in a PRPH2 cohort study (Reeves et al. 2020). This variant is listed in dbSNP and/or HGMD (rs281865373,CS010139). It is present in gnomAD browser (AF 0.00000429). It is enriched in the PRPH2 disease cohort. We invoked ACMG criteria [PS4, PP1-S, PM2, PP3, PP5] and classified NM_000322.4:c.828+3A>T in the PRPH2 gene as a Pathogenic mutation.
NEI Ophthalmic Genomics Laboratory, National Institutes of Health RCV001250347 SCV001424667 pathogenic Vitelliform macular dystrophy 2 2020-01-07 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing The variant NM_000322.4:c.828+3A>T in the PRPH2 gene has been previously studied(PMIDs 11139241, 11704030, 25675413, 25525159, 26842753). We found this variant in 36 patient(s) in a PRPH2 cohort study (Reeves et al. 2020). This variant is listed in dbSNP and/or HGMD (rs281865373,CS010139). It is present in gnomAD browser (AF 0.00000429). It is enriched in the PRPH2 disease cohort. We invoked ACMG criteria [PS4, PP1-S, PM2, PP3, PP5] and classified NM_000322.4:c.828+3A>T in the PRPH2 gene as a Pathogenic mutation.
NEI Ophthalmic Genomics Laboratory, National Institutes of Health RCV001250357 SCV001424685 pathogenic Retinitis pigmentosa 2020-01-07 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing The variant NM_000322.4:c.828+3A>T in the PRPH2 gene has been previously studied(PMIDs 11139241, 11704030, 25675413, 25525159, 26842753). We found this variant in 36 patient(s) in a PRPH2 cohort study (Reeves et al. 2020). This variant is listed in dbSNP and/or HGMD (rs281865373,CS010139). It is present in gnomAD browser (AF 0.00000429). It is enriched in the PRPH2 disease cohort. We invoked ACMG criteria [PS4, PP1-S, PM2, PP3, PP5] and classified NM_000322.4:c.828+3A>T in the PRPH2 gene as a Pathogenic mutation.
NEI Ophthalmic Genomics Laboratory, National Institutes of Health RCV001250358 SCV001424686 pathogenic Doyne honeycomb retinal dystrophy 2020-01-07 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing The variant NM_000322.4:c.828+3A>T in the PRPH2 gene has been previously studied(PMIDs 11139241, 11704030, 25675413, 25525159, 26842753). We found this variant in 36 patient(s) in a PRPH2 cohort study (Reeves et al. 2020). This variant is listed in dbSNP and/or HGMD (rs281865373, CS010139). It is present in gnomAD browser (AF 0.00000429). It is enriched in the PRPH2 disease cohort. We invoked ACMG criteria [PS4, PP1-S, PM2, PP3, PP5] and classified NM_000322.4:c.828+3A>T in the PRPH2 gene as a Pathogenic mutation.
NEI Ophthalmic Genomics Laboratory, National Institutes of Health RCV001250359 SCV001424687 pathogenic Cone-rod dystrophy 2020-01-07 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing The variant NM_000322.4:c.828+3A>T in the PRPH2 gene has been previously studied(PMIDs 11139241, 11704030, 25675413, 25525159, 26842753). We found this variant in 36 patient(s) in a PRPH2 cohort study (Reeves et al. 2020). This variant is listed in dbSNP and/or HGMD (rs281865373, CS010139). It is present in gnomAD browser (AF 0.00000429). It is enriched in the PRPH2 disease cohort. We invoked ACMG criteria [PS4, PP1-S, PM2, PP3, PP5] and classified NM_000322.4:c.828+3A>T in the PRPH2 gene as a Pathogenic mutation.
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp RCV001047656 SCV004222903 pathogenic PRPH2-Related Disorders 2023-11-20 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing Variant summary: PRPH2 c.828+3A>T alters a non-conserved nucleotide located close to a canonical splice site and therefore could affect mRNA splicing, leading to a significantly altered protein sequence. Several computational tools predict a significant impact on normal splicing: four predict the variant weakens a canonical 5' donor site. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 8.4e-06 in 238042 control chromosomes (gnomAD). At least one study reports experimental evidence supporting this prediction, finding aberantly spliced transcripts in affected individuals (Shankar_2015). The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. c.828+3A>T has been reported in the literature in many individuals affected with retinal degeneration including retinitis pigmentosa (Sullivan_2006, Shankar_2015, Reeves_2020). These reports suggest the variant is very likely to be associated with disease. The following publications have been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 16799052, 32531846, 25675413). Six submitters have cited clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014. All submitters classified the variant as pathogenic/likely pathogenic. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as pathogenic.
Retina International RCV000085026 SCV000117162 not provided not provided no assertion provided not provided
Leiden Open Variation Database RCV000085026 SCV001745010 likely pathogenic not provided 2021-05-27 no assertion criteria provided curation Curator: Global Variome, with Curator vacancy. Submitters to LOVD: Julia Lopez, LOVD, Manon Peeters.
GenomeConnect - Invitae Patient Insights Network RCV001047656 SCV001749590 not provided PRPH2-Related Disorders no assertion provided phenotyping only Variant interpreted as Pathogenic and reported on 10-29-2020 by Invitae. GenomeConnect-Invitae Patient Insights Network assertions are reported exactly as they appear on the patient-provided report from the testing laboratory. Registry team members make no attempt to reinterpret the clinical significance of the variant. Phenotypic details are available under supporting information.
Genomics England Pilot Project, Genomics England RCV001542666 SCV001760180 likely pathogenic Patterned macular dystrophy 1 no assertion criteria provided clinical testing

The information on this website is not intended for direct diagnostic use or medical decision-making without review by a genetics professional. Individuals should not change their health behavior solely on the basis of information contained on this website. Neither the University of Utah nor the National Institutes of Health independently verfies the submitted information. If you have questions about the information contained on this website, please see a health care professional.