ClinVar Miner

Submissions for variant NM_000329.3(RPE65):c.65T>C (p.Leu22Pro)

gnomAD frequency: 0.00004  dbSNP: rs61751277
Minimum review status: Collection method:
Minimum conflict level:
ClinVar version:
Total submissions: 9
Download table as spreadsheet
Submitter RCV SCV Clinical significance Condition Last evaluated Review status Method Comment
ClinGen Leber Congenital Amaurosis/early Onset Retinal Dystrophy Variant Curation Expert Panel, ClinGen RCV003764796 SCV004697380 likely pathogenic RPE65-related recessive retinopathy 2024-02-18 reviewed by expert panel curation NM_000329.3(RPE65):c.65T>C is a missense variant causing substitution of leucine with proline at position 22. This variant is present in gnomAD v.2.1.1 at a GrpMax allele frequency of 0.00002137, with 2 alleles / 16214 total alleles in the African/African-American population, which is lower than the ClinGen LCA / eoRD VCEP PM2_Supporting threshold of <0.0002 (PM2_Supporting). At least one proband harboring this variant exhibits a phenotype including onset in infancy (1 pt), nyctalopia since childhood (0.5 pts), diagnosis based on a 300-gene testing panel that did not provide an alternative explanation for visual impairment (2 pts), non-detectable rod ERG response (0.5 pts), reduced cone ERG response (1 pt), reduced visual acuity (1 pt), light-seeking behavior (1 pt), retinal vessel attenuation (0.5 pts), optic nerve pallor (0.5 pts), and pigment clumping (0.5 pts), which together are highly specific for RPE65-related recessive retinopathy (8 total points, VCEP member-provided data, PP4_Moderate). This variant has been reported in at least 1 proband with early-onset severe retinal dystrophy who was homozygous for the variant (0.5 pts, PMID: 35129589, PMID: 28127548, VCEP member-provided data). This variant has also been reported in at least 2 probands with early-onset severe retinal dystrophy who were compound heterozygous with the NM_000329.3(RPE65):c.1067dup (p.Asn356fs) or NM_000329.3(RPE65):c.10C>T (p.Gln4Ter) variants suspected in trans (1 pt, PMID: 35129589), which were previously classified pathogenic by the ClinGen LCA / eoRD VCEP (1.5 total pts, PM3). The computational predictor REVEL gives a score of 0.711, which is above the ClinGen LCA / eoRD VCEP PP3 threshold of >=0.644 and predicts a damaging effect on RPE65 function (PP3). The variant exhibited 2.8-13.5% enzymatic activity in retinoid isomerase assays relative to the wild-type control, which is lower than the ClinGen LCA / eoRD PS3_Supporting threshold of <10% activity, indicating that it triggers a severe defect in protein function (PS3_Supporting, PMID: 18599565, PMID: 24849605, PMID: 26427455). In summary, this variant meets the criteria to be classified as likely pathogenic for RPE65-related recessive retinopathy based on the ACMG/AMP criteria applied, as specified by the ClinGen LCA / eoRD VCEP: PS3_Supporting, PM2_Supporting, PM3, PP3, and PP4_Moderate. (VCEP specifications version 1.0.0; date of approval 09/21/2023).
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen RCV000085218 SCV001245622 pathogenic not provided 2017-08-01 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
Invitae RCV001218527 SCV001390413 pathogenic Leber congenital amaurosis 2; Retinitis pigmentosa 20 2023-12-20 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing This sequence change replaces leucine, which is neutral and non-polar, with proline, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 22 of the RPE65 protein (p.Leu22Pro). This variant is present in population databases (rs61751277, gnomAD 0.01%). This missense change has been observed in individuals with autosomal recessive retinal dystrophy (PMID: 9801879, 17724218; Invitae). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 98888). Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) performed at Invitae indicates that this missense variant is not expected to disrupt RPE65 protein function with a negative predictive value of 80%. Experimental studies have shown that this missense change affects RPE65 function (PMID: 18599565, 24849605, 26427455). For these reasons, this variant has been classified as Pathogenic.
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp RCV002222384 SCV002500680 pathogenic Leber congenital amaurosis 2022-03-28 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing Variant summary: RPE65 c.65T>C (p.Leu22Pro) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 2.8e-05 in 251322 control chromosomes. c.65T>C has been reported in the literature as a homozygous and compound heterozygous genotypes in individuals with inherited retinal degeneration/retinal dystrophy/Leber Congenital Amaurosis (example, Marlhens_1998, Hamel_2001, Sallum_2020, Tests_2022). These data indicate that the variant is very likely to be associated with disease. At least one publication reports experimental evidence evaluating an impact on protein function (Jin_2016). The most pronounced variant effect results in <10% of normal Retinoid isomerase activity in vitro. Three clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. All laboratories classified the variant as pathogenic. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as pathogenic.
GeneDx RCV000085218 SCV003918424 pathogenic not provided 2023-04-16 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing Published functional studies demonstrate a damaging effect with reduced protein expression and reduced RPE65 isomerase activity (Li et al., 2014; Lorenz et al., 2008); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 25525159, 26427455, 18599565, 19373675, 9801879, 11264131, 32865313, 35835501, 24849605, 10800710)
Neuberg Supratech Reference Laboratories Pvt Ltd, Neuberg Centre for Genomic Medicine RCV001250672 SCV004101561 pathogenic Leber congenital amaurosis 2 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing The c.65T>C(p.Leu22Pro) missense variant in RPE65 gene has been reported in the literature as a homozygous and compound heterozygous genotypes in individuals with inherited retinal degeneration/retinal dystrophy/Leber Congenital Amaurosis (Sallum et al., 2020; Testa et al., 2022). Experimental studies have shown that this variant has an impact on protein function (Jin et al., 2016). This variant is reported with the allele frequency (0.002%) in the gnomAD and novel in 1000 genome database. It has been submitted to ClinVar as a Pathogenic variant. The amino acid Leu at position 22 is changed to a Pro changing protein sequence and it might alter its composition and physico-chemical properties. The amino acid change p.Leu22Pro in RPE65 is predicted as conserved by GERP++ and PhyloP across 100 vertebrates. For these reasons, this variant has been classified as Pathogenic. This variant is unrelat ed to the fetal hydrops and IUDs in the previous children, however since this is a previously report ed pathogenic variant , the same has been report ed here in the couple.
Baylor Genetics RCV001250672 SCV004209220 pathogenic Leber congenital amaurosis 2 2023-10-11 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
Retina International RCV000085218 SCV000117355 not provided not provided no assertion provided not provided
Laboratory of Genetics in Ophthalmology, Institut Imagine RCV001250672 SCV001425542 likely pathogenic Leber congenital amaurosis 2 no assertion criteria provided research

The information on this website is not intended for direct diagnostic use or medical decision-making without review by a genetics professional. Individuals should not change their health behavior solely on the basis of information contained on this website. Neither the University of Utah nor the National Institutes of Health independently verfies the submitted information. If you have questions about the information contained on this website, please see a health care professional.