ClinVar Miner

Submissions for variant NM_000329.3(RPE65):c.74C>T (p.Pro25Leu)

gnomAD frequency: 0.00002  dbSNP: rs199683808
Minimum review status: Collection method:
Minimum conflict level:
ClinVar version:
Total submissions: 9
Download table as spreadsheet
Submitter RCV SCV Clinical significance Condition Last evaluated Review status Method Comment
ClinGen Leber Congenital Amaurosis/early Onset Retinal Dystrophy Variant Curation Expert Panel, ClinGen RCV004527379 SCV005038778 pathogenic RPE65-related recessive retinopathy 2024-04-22 reviewed by expert panel curation NM_000329.3(RPE65):c.74C>T is a missense variant predicted to replace proline with leucine at position 25 in exon 2 of RPE65. This variant has been reported in at least 1 proband with early-onset severe retinal dystrophy who was homozygous for the variant (0.5 points, PMIDs: 18599565). This variant has also been reported in at least 3 probands with early-onset severe retinal dystrophy who were either compound heterozygous with the c.893del p.Lys298fs variant confirmed in trans (1 pt), with the Arg515Trp variant suspected in trans (0.5 pts), or with the c.11+5G>A variant suspected in trans (0.5 pts), PMIDs: 35001204, 36672611, 30025081), which were all previously classified as pathogenic by the ClinGen LCA / eoRD VCEP (2.5 total points, PM3_Strong). This variant has also been reported in additional probands in the compound heterozygous state with the Ala434Glu or Tyr79His variants, but these cases were not considered to avoid circularity in the application of the PM3 code or due to insufficient phenotype data (PMIDs 29033008, 32581362, 22807296). At least one proband harboring this variant exhibits a phenotype including significant, documented improvement of dark-adapted vision after treatment with RPE65 gene therapy (8 pt), congenital night blindness (0.5 pt), nystagmus (1 pt), decreased central visual acuity (1 pt), and onset between birth and age five years (1 pt), which together are highly specific for RPE65-related recessive retinopathy (11.5 points, PMID: 36672611, PP4_Moderate). The variant exhibited 7.75% enzymatic activity in a retinoid isomerase assay relative to the wild-type control, which is lower than the ClinGen LCA / eoRD PS3_Supporting threshold of <10% activity, indicating that it triggers a severe defect in protein function (PS3_Supporting, PMID: 18599565). The computational predictor REVEL gives a score of 0.898, which is above the ClinGen LCA / eoRD VCEP threshold of ≥ 0.773 and predicts a damaging effect on RPE65 function (PP3_Moderate). This variant is present in gnomAD v.2.1.1 at a GrpMax allele frequency of 0.0001, with 1/30582 total alleles in the South Asian population, which is lower than the ClinGen LCA / eoRD VCEP PM2_Supporting threshold of <0.0002 (PM2_Supporting). In summary, this variant meets the criteria to be classified as Pathogenic for RPE65-related recessive retinopathy based on the ACMG/AMP criteria applied, as specified by the ClinGen LCA/eoRD VCEP: PM3_Strong, PP3_Moderate, PP4_Moderate, PS3_Supporting, PM3_Supporting (VCEP specifications version 1.0.0; date of approval 09/21/2023).
Blueprint Genetics RCV000504723 SCV001238858 likely pathogenic Retinal dystrophy 2018-11-11 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp RCV001377674 SCV001575065 pathogenic Leber congenital amaurosis 2; Retinitis pigmentosa 20 2024-01-31 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing This sequence change replaces proline, which is neutral and non-polar, with leucine, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 25 of the RPE65 protein (p.Pro25Leu). This variant is present in population databases (rs199683808, gnomAD 0.007%). This missense change has been observed in individuals with autosomal recessive inherited retinal dystrophy (PMID: 18599565, 28041643, 30268864, 34906470). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 437985). Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) performed at Invitae indicates that this missense variant is not expected to disrupt RPE65 protein function with a negative predictive value of 80%. Experimental studies have shown that this missense change affects RPE65 function (PMID: 18599565, 25972377). For these reasons, this variant has been classified as Pathogenic.
Broad Center for Mendelian Genomics, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard RCV001724032 SCV001950353 likely pathogenic Retinitis pigmentosa 2021-04-01 criteria provided, single submitter curation The p.Pro25Leu variant in RPE65 was identified in an individual with Retinitis pigmentosa, via a collaborative study between the Broad Institute's Center for Mendelian Genomics and the Pierce lab (https://oculargenomics.meei.harvard.edu/labs/pierce-lab/lab-members/). Through a review of available evidence we were able to apply the following criteria: PM3, PS3, PM3. Based on this evidence we have classified this variant as Likely Pathogenic. If you have any questions about the classification please reach out to the Pierce Lab.
Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics RCV002496962 SCV002809907 likely pathogenic Leber congenital amaurosis 2; Retinitis pigmentosa 20; Retinitis pigmentosa 87 with choroidal involvement 2021-12-21 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
Baylor Genetics RCV001250673 SCV004209223 likely pathogenic Leber congenital amaurosis 2 2024-01-29 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
NIHR Bioresource Rare Diseases, University of Cambridge RCV000504723 SCV000598729 likely pathogenic Retinal dystrophy 2015-01-01 no assertion criteria provided research
Laboratory of Genetics in Ophthalmology, Institut Imagine RCV001250673 SCV001425543 likely pathogenic Leber congenital amaurosis 2 no assertion criteria provided research
Natera, Inc. RCV001834621 SCV002092783 likely pathogenic Leber congenital amaurosis 2021-03-08 no assertion criteria provided clinical testing

The information on this website is not intended for direct diagnostic use or medical decision-making without review by a genetics professional. Individuals should not change their health behavior solely on the basis of information contained on this website. Neither the University of Utah nor the National Institutes of Health independently verfies the submitted information. If you have questions about the information contained on this website, please see a health care professional.