ClinVar Miner

Submissions for variant NM_000335.5(SCN5A):c.2876T>C (p.Leu959Pro)

gnomAD frequency: 0.00001  dbSNP: rs1276970820
Minimum review status: Collection method:
Minimum conflict level:
ClinVar version:
Total submissions: 5
Download table as spreadsheet
Submitter RCV SCV Clinical significance Condition Last evaluated Review status Method Comment
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp RCV002223919 SCV000828050 uncertain significance not provided 2024-12-23 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing This sequence change replaces leucine, which is neutral and non-polar, with proline, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 959 of the SCN5A protein (p.Leu959Pro). This variant is present in population databases (no rsID available, gnomAD 0.003%). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with SCN5A-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 576769). An algorithm developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function (PolyPhen-2) suggests that this variant is likely to be disruptive. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance.
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health RCV001841868 SCV001354873 uncertain significance Cardiac arrhythmia 2019-11-05 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing This missense variant replaces leucine with proline at codon 959 of the SCN5A protein. Computational prediction tool suggests that this variant may have deleterious impact on protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold ≥0.7, PMID: 27666373). Splice site prediction tools suggest that this variant may not impact RNA splicing. To our knowledge, functional studies have not been performed for this variant. This variant has not been reported in individuals affected with cardiovascular disorders in the literature. This variant has been identified in 3/248026 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance.
AiLife Diagnostics, AiLife Diagnostics RCV002223919 SCV002502596 uncertain significance not provided 2021-10-27 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health RCV001841868 SCV004826235 uncertain significance Cardiac arrhythmia 2024-07-29 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing This missense variant replaces leucine with proline at codon 959 of the SCN5A protein. Computational prediction tool suggests that this variant may have deleterious impact on protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold >=0.7, PMID: 27666373). Splice site prediction tools suggest that this variant may not impact RNA splicing. To our knowledge, functional studies have not been performed for this variant. This variant has not been reported in individuals affected with cardiovascular disorders in the literature. This variant has been identified in 3/248026 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance.
Ambry Genetics RCV004659181 SCV005159794 uncertain significance Cardiovascular phenotype 2024-05-10 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing The p.L959P variant (also known as c.2876T>C), located in coding exon 16 of the SCN5A gene, results from a T to C substitution at nucleotide position 2876. The leucine at codon 959 is replaced by proline, an amino acid with similar properties. This amino acid position is well conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be deleterious by in silico analysis. Based on the available evidence, the clinical significance of this variant remains unclear.

The information on this website is not intended for direct diagnostic use or medical decision-making without review by a genetics professional. Individuals should not change their health behavior solely on the basis of information contained on this website. Neither the University of Utah nor the National Institutes of Health independently verfies the submitted information. If you have questions about the information contained on this website, please see a health care professional.