ClinVar Miner

Submissions for variant NM_000335.5(SCN5A):c.373G>C (p.Val125Leu)

dbSNP: rs199473059
Minimum review status: Collection method:
Minimum conflict level:
ClinVar version:
Total submissions: 7
Download table as spreadsheet
Submitter RCV SCV Clinical significance Condition Last evaluated Review status Method Comment
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health RCV001842348 SCV000911300 likely benign Cardiac arrhythmia 2018-10-03 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp RCV001555910 SCV001011148 likely benign not provided 2024-05-07 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
Mendelics RCV000987243 SCV001136493 benign Brugada syndrome 1 2023-08-22 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp RCV001375549 SCV001572418 likely benign not specified 2021-04-08 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing Variant summary: SCN5A c.373G>C (p.Val125Leu) results in a conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00022 in 249290 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.0017 within the South Asian subpopulation in the gnomAD database, including 1 homozygote. The observed variant frequency within South Asian control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 17-fold the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in SCN5A causing Arrhythmia phenotype (0.0001), suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of South Asian origin. c.373G>C has been reported in the literature in individuals with suspected long QT syndrome (e.g.Tester_2005) . These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Arrhythmia. At least one publication reports experimental evidence evaluating an impact on protein function, however, does not allow convincing conclusions about the variant effect (e.g. Gutter_2013). Three other clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation, citing the variant as likely benign (n=2) and uncertain significance (n=1). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign.
GeneDx RCV001555910 SCV001777402 likely benign not provided 2018-07-09 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 28988457, 23805106, 28150151, 29396286, 25351510, 19716085, 15840476)
Ambry Genetics RCV002345370 SCV002622650 likely benign Cardiovascular phenotype 2019-12-23 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity.
Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit, Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust RCV000058596 SCV000090116 not provided Congenital long QT syndrome no assertion provided literature only This variant has been reported as associated with Long QT syndrome in the following publications (PMID:15840476;PMID:19716085). This is a literature report, and does not necessarily reflect the clinical interpretation of the Imperial College / Royal Brompton Cardiovascular Genetics laboratory.

The information on this website is not intended for direct diagnostic use or medical decision-making without review by a genetics professional. Individuals should not change their health behavior solely on the basis of information contained on this website. Neither the University of Utah nor the National Institutes of Health independently verfies the submitted information. If you have questions about the information contained on this website, please see a health care professional.