Total submissions: 11
Submitter | RCV | SCV | Clinical significance | Condition | Last evaluated | Review status | Method | Comment |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Labcorp Genetics |
RCV003539915 | SCV000637152 | likely benign | not provided | 2024-01-03 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | |
Gene |
RCV000608084 | SCV000727273 | likely benign | not specified | 2018-02-05 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. |
Illumina Laboratory Services, |
RCV001144566 | SCV001305177 | uncertain significance | Brugada syndrome 1 | 2019-04-18 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. |
Illumina Laboratory Services, |
RCV001144567 | SCV001305178 | uncertain significance | Dilated cardiomyopathy 1E | 2019-04-18 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. |
Illumina Laboratory Services, |
RCV001144568 | SCV001305179 | uncertain significance | Long QT syndrome 3 | 2019-04-18 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. |
Illumina Laboratory Services, |
RCV001144569 | SCV001305180 | uncertain significance | Progressive familial heart block, type 1A | 2019-04-18 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. |
Illumina Laboratory Services, |
RCV001144570 | SCV001305181 | uncertain significance | Sick sinus syndrome 1 | 2019-04-18 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. |
Illumina Laboratory Services, |
RCV001144571 | SCV001305182 | uncertain significance | Ventricular fibrillation, paroxysmal familial, type 1 | 2019-04-18 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. |
Color Diagnostics, |
RCV001841472 | SCV001349219 | likely benign | Cardiac arrhythmia | 2018-11-14 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | |
Ambry Genetics | RCV002330862 | SCV002631068 | likely benign | Cardiovascular phenotype | 2019-07-08 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. |
Roden Lab, |
RCV001144566 | SCV005200425 | uncertain significance | Brugada syndrome 1 | criteria provided, single submitter | research | We classified this variant using data from the calibrated functional assay 'ParSE-seq' (PMID: 37732247), population data, and in silico data within the ACMG v3 framework (PMID: 25741868)The SCN5A variant, 3-38557234-C-T was evaluated for association with the loss-of-function condition Brugada Syndrome.This Variant had an AF of 0.0000328 in gnomAD v3The in silico predictor SpliceAI scored the variant as 0.434512; normal <0.2, likely damaging >0.5.Using the functional RNA-splicing assay, ParSE-seq, the variant was evaluated to have no impact on splicing (BS3_strong) following the Brnich et al. calibration framework (PMID: 31892348). We do not apply benign splicing functional data to missense variants. In aggregate, we therefore classify this variant as VUS using these collective data. |