ClinVar Miner

Submissions for variant NM_000359.3(TGM1):c.550C>T (p.Pro184Ser)

gnomAD frequency: 0.00006  dbSNP: rs200517023
Minimum review status: Collection method:
Minimum conflict level:
ClinVar version:
Total submissions: 5
Download table as spreadsheet
Submitter RCV SCV Clinical significance Condition Last evaluated Review status Method Comment
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp RCV000920257 SCV001065619 likely benign not provided 2024-10-28 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina RCV001112581 SCV001270252 uncertain significance Autosomal recessive congenital ichthyosis 1 2017-04-28 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. However, the evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was not sufficient to rule this variant in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance.
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp RCV002265909 SCV002547990 likely benign not specified 2022-05-31 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing Variant summary: TGM1 c.550C>T (p.Pro184Ser) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00072 in 251354 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.0054 within the South Asian subpopulation in the gnomAD database, including 1 homozygote. The observed variant frequency within South Asian control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 2.6 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in TGM1 causing Lamellar Ichthyosis phenotype (0.0021), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of South Asian origin. c.550C>T has been reported in the literature in at-least one individual affected with congenital ichthyosiform erythroderma (CIE) (example, Numata_2015). These report(s) do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Lamellar Ichthyosis. At least one publication reports experimental evidence evaluating an impact on protein function, however, does not allow convincing conclusions about the variant effect (Numata_2016). Three clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation (likely benign, n=2; VUS, n=1). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign.
GeneDx RCV000920257 SCV003845583 uncertain significance not provided 2023-03-24 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing Observed with another TGM1 variant in a patient with ARCI in the published literature, but it is not known whether the variants occurred on the same (in cis) or on different (in trans) chromosomes (Numata et al., 2015); Published functional studies suggest a damaging effect: formation of perinuclear aggregates and decreased localization to membranes (Numata et al., 2016); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 34426522, 33138774, 26990434, 25766764)
Natera, Inc. RCV001112581 SCV002091234 benign Autosomal recessive congenital ichthyosis 1 2019-11-13 no assertion criteria provided clinical testing

The information on this website is not intended for direct diagnostic use or medical decision-making without review by a genetics professional. Individuals should not change their health behavior solely on the basis of information contained on this website. Neither the University of Utah nor the National Institutes of Health independently verfies the submitted information. If you have questions about the information contained on this website, please see a health care professional.