Total submissions: 5
Submitter | RCV | SCV | Clinical significance | Condition | Last evaluated | Review status | Method | Comment |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Invitae | RCV000459363 | SCV000554122 | likely benign | Peutz-Jeghers syndrome | 2023-12-04 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | |
Color Diagnostics, |
RCV001181771 | SCV001346978 | uncertain significance | Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome | 2021-10-27 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | This variant causes a C to G nucleotide substitution at the -10 position of intron 3 of the STK11 gene. Splice site prediction tools are inconclusive regarding the impact of this variant on RNA splicing. To our knowledge, RNA functional studies have not been reported for this variant. This variant has not been reported in individuals affected with hereditary cancer in the literature. This variant has not been identified in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. |
Genome- |
RCV000459363 | SCV002057250 | uncertain significance | Peutz-Jeghers syndrome | 2021-07-15 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | |
CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, |
RCV003492063 | SCV004239726 | uncertain significance | Breast and/or ovarian cancer | 2023-05-01 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | |
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, |
RCV001357591 | SCV001553103 | uncertain significance | Malignant tumor of breast | no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | The STK11 c.465-10C>G variant was not identified in the literature nor was it identified in the dbSNP, Cosmic, LOVD 3.0, Zhejiang University, or Insight Hereditary Tumors databases. The variant was identified in ClinVar (classified as likely benign by Invitae). The variant was not identified in the following control databases: the 1000 Genomes Project, the NHLBI GO Exome Sequencing Project, the Exome Aggregation Consortium (August 8th 2016), or the Genome Aggregation Database (Feb 27, 2017). The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time. This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance. |