ClinVar Miner

Submissions for variant NM_000492.4(CFTR):c.1251C>A (p.Asn417Lys)

dbSNP: rs4727853
Minimum review status: Collection method:
Minimum conflict level:
ClinVar version:
Total submissions: 10
Download table as spreadsheet
Submitter RCV SCV Clinical significance Condition Last evaluated Review status Method Comment
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) RCV000173697 SCV000224841 benign not specified 2015-03-21 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics RCV000224343 SCV000281114 benign not provided 2015-12-28 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina RCV001095146 SCV000466511 likely benign CFTR-related disorder 2018-01-13 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease.
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp RCV000366455 SCV000562317 benign Cystic fibrosis 2024-01-16 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp RCV000224343 SCV000696832 uncertain significance not provided 2017-08-22 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing Variant summary: The CFTR c.1251C>A (p.Asn417Lys) variant involves the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. 3/5 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. This variant was found in 5925/206340 control chromosomes (gnomAD) at a frequency of 0.02871, which is approximately 1.5 times the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic CFTR variant (0.0129603), suggesting this variant is likely a benign polymorphism. However, gnomAD notes that the variant is located in a "segmental duplication region, failed random forests filters, and has an inbreeding coefficient of < -0.03." ExAC, 1790/94952 (frequency: 0.01885) notes that this variant is only covered in 47476 individuals (adjusted allele number = 94952), which is fewer than 80% of the individuals in ExAC, indicating a potentially low-quality site. In addition, each control database, gnomAD and ExAC, show significantly different allele frequencies in each of the subpopulations, making interpretation of the data difficult. Additionally, the relatively high allele frequencies reported by ExAC and gnomAD would be expected to result in homozygous individuals in the population if the allele is benign; however, neither database reports any homozygotes, despite allele frequencies as high as 9-12% in some subpopulations. This may be due to linkage to a nearby pathogenic variant, such as deltaF508, where homozygosity of the variant of interest results in homozygosity of the pathogenic allele, leading to a absence of homozygotes for the variant in the general population. The variant has been reported in the literature without strong evidence for or against causality. In addition, multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories/reputable databases classified this variant as likely benign or benign. Taken together, this variant is classified as a "Variant of Uncertain Significance - Possibly Benign," until additional information becomes available such as higher quality control data and/or functional studies.
Genome-Nilou Lab RCV000366455 SCV001822043 likely benign Cystic fibrosis 2021-07-22 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
Institute for Clinical Genetics, University Hospital TU Dresden, University Hospital TU Dresden RCV000224343 SCV002009135 uncertain significance not provided 2021-11-03 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano RCV000224343 SCV002046111 benign not provided 2020-09-30 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
Ambry Genetics RCV000366455 SCV002669577 likely benign Cystic fibrosis 2019-09-26 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity.
Neuberg Centre For Genomic Medicine, NCGM RCV000366455 SCV004100915 uncertain significance Cystic fibrosis criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing The missense variant p.N417K in CFTR (NM_000492.3) has not been reported previously as a pathogenic variant nor as a benign variant, to our knowledge. Although the variant is present at 0.5826% in gnomAD Exomes, it has the flag "Failed Random Forest" and may not represent the true population frequency. The p.N417K variant is novel (not in any individuals) in 1000 Genomes. There is a moderate physicochemical difference between asparagine and lysine. The p.N417K missense variant is predicted to be tolerated by both SIFT or PolyPhen2. The nucleotide c.1251 in CFTR is not conserved according to a GERP++ and PhyloP analysis of 100 vertebrates. For these reasons, this variant has been classified as Uncertain Significance.

The information on this website is not intended for direct diagnostic use or medical decision-making without review by a genetics professional. Individuals should not change their health behavior solely on the basis of information contained on this website. Neither the University of Utah nor the National Institutes of Health independently verfies the submitted information. If you have questions about the information contained on this website, please see a health care professional.