ClinVar Miner

Submissions for variant NM_000492.4(CFTR):c.3299A>C (p.Gln1100Pro)

dbSNP: rs397508535
Minimum review status: Collection method:
Minimum conflict level:
ClinVar version:
Total submissions: 10
Download table as spreadsheet
Submitter RCV SCV Clinical significance Condition Last evaluated Review status Method Comment
Counsyl RCV000577192 SCV000788838 likely pathogenic Cystic fibrosis 2017-01-05 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
Mendelics RCV000577192 SCV000886271 pathogenic Cystic fibrosis 2018-11-05 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
Baylor Genetics RCV001004493 SCV001163538 likely pathogenic Cystic fibrosis; Congenital bilateral aplasia of vas deferens from CFTR mutation criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp RCV000577192 SCV001361658 pathogenic Cystic fibrosis 2023-12-14 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing Variant summary: CFTR c.3299A>C (p.Gln1100Pro) results in a non-conservative amino acid change located in the ABC transporter type 1, transmembrane domain of the encoded protein sequence. Four of four in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 4e-06 in 251108 control chromosomes. c.3299A>C has been reported in the literature in multiple individuals affected with Cystic Fibrosis (Mota_2018, Siryani_2015, Alonso_2007, Chillon_1994). These data indicate that the variant is very likely to be associated with disease. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Five submitters have cited clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014: four submitters have classified the variant as likely pathogenic/pathogenic while one classified as VUS. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as pathogenic.
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp RCV000577192 SCV001587681 pathogenic Cystic fibrosis 2024-01-25 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing This sequence change replaces glutamine, which is neutral and polar, with proline, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 1100 of the CFTR protein (p.Gln1100Pro). This variant is present in population databases (rs397508535, gnomAD 0.003%). This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with cystic fibrosis (PMID: 16240056, 26208274, 27145507, 30232781). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 53711). Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) performed at Invitae indicates that this missense variant is expected to disrupt CFTR protein function with a positive predictive value of 80%. This variant disrupts the p.Gln1100 amino acid residue in CFTR. Other variant(s) that disrupt this residue have been observed in individuals with CFTR-related conditions (PMID: 23240968), which suggests that this may be a clinically significant amino acid residue. For these reasons, this variant has been classified as Pathogenic.
Ambry Genetics RCV000577192 SCV002611982 pathogenic Cystic fibrosis 2024-06-13 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing The p.Q1100P pathogenic mutation (also known as c.3299A>C), located in coding exon 20 of the CFTR gene, results from an A to C substitution at nucleotide position 3299. The glutamine at codon 1100 is replaced by proline, an amino acid with similar properties. This variant has been identified in the homozygous state and in conjunction with other CFTR variant(s) in individuals with features consistent with cystic fibrosis (Guardiano M et al. Rev Port Pneumol, 2005;11:381-406; Essawi O et al. Dis. Markers, 2015;2015:458653; Mota LR et al. Mol Biol Rep, 2018 Dec;45:2045-2051; Ambry internal data). In multiple assays testing CFTR function, this variant showed functionally abnormal results (Ramalho SS et al. Int J Mol Sci, 2021 Dec;23:; Bihler H et al. J Cyst Fibros, 2024 Feb;:). This amino acid position is highly conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be deleterious by in silico analysis. This variant is considered to be rare based on population cohorts in the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). Based on the supporting evidence, this variant is interpreted as a disease-causing mutation.
Baylor Genetics RCV003474574 SCV004213446 pathogenic Bronchiectasis with or without elevated sweat chloride 1 2024-03-13 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
Johns Hopkins Genomics, Johns Hopkins University RCV000577192 SCV004239074 likely pathogenic Cystic fibrosis 2023-09-13 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing CFTR c.3299A>C has been identified in multiple individuals with elevated sweat chloride concentration and features of cystic fibrosis (CF) who also have a second CF-causing CFTR variant, although the phase of these variants has not been confirmed. This CFTR variant (rs397508535) is rare (<0.1%) in a large population dataset (gnomADv2.1.1: 1/251108 total alleles; 0.0004%; no homozygotes) and has been reported in ClinVar (Variation ID: 53711). A single peer-reviewed functional study indicates that this variant may impact CFTR trafficking. The glutamine residue at this position is evolutionarily conserved across most species assessed, but not fish. We consider CFTR c.3299A>C to be likely pathogenic.
ClinVar Staff, National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) RCV000577192 SCV000679059 not provided Cystic fibrosis no assertion provided literature only
Natera, Inc. RCV001831772 SCV002083628 pathogenic CFTR-related disorder 2020-11-11 no assertion criteria provided clinical testing

The information on this website is not intended for direct diagnostic use or medical decision-making without review by a genetics professional. Individuals should not change their health behavior solely on the basis of information contained on this website. Neither the University of Utah nor the National Institutes of Health independently verfies the submitted information. If you have questions about the information contained on this website, please see a health care professional.