ClinVar Miner

Submissions for variant NM_000492.4(CFTR):c.869+5G>A

gnomAD frequency: 0.00001  dbSNP: rs533959068
Minimum review status: Collection method:
Minimum conflict level:
ClinVar version:
Total submissions: 9
Download table as spreadsheet
Submitter RCV SCV Clinical significance Condition Last evaluated Review status Method Comment
Counsyl RCV000668284 SCV000792858 uncertain significance Cystic fibrosis 2017-07-21 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp RCV000781277 SCV000919190 likely pathogenic not specified 2018-05-24 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing Variant summary: CFTR c.869+5G>A alters a conserved nucleotide located close to a canonical splice site and therefore could affect mRNA splicing, leading to a significantly altered protein sequence. Several computational tools predict a significant impact on normal splicing: Two predict the variant abolishes a 5' splicing donor site and two predict the variant weakens a 5' donor site. At least one publication reports experimental evidence that this variant affects mRNA splicing (Raynal_2013). The variant allele was found at a frequency of 8.2e-06 in 243092 control chromosomes (gnomAD). This frequency is not significantly higher than expected for a pathogenic variant in CFTR causing CFTR-related diseases (8.2e-06 vs 1.30e-02), allowing no conclusion about variant significance. The variant, c.869+5G>A, has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with CF and CBAVD (Girardet_2007, Goh_2007). These data indicate that the variant may be associated with disease. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014. The CFTR-France database cites the variant in a CF patient with classification of 'disease-causing' and UMD and Sickkids cite the variant in a CF patient with deltaF508 in trans. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely pathogenic.
CFTR-France RCV000668284 SCV001169323 pathogenic Cystic fibrosis 2018-01-29 criteria provided, single submitter curation
Invitae RCV000668284 SCV001233424 pathogenic Cystic fibrosis 2023-12-12 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing This sequence change falls in intron 7 of the CFTR gene. It does not directly change the encoded amino acid sequence of the CFTR protein. RNA analysis indicates that this variant induces altered splicing and likely results in a shortened protein product. This variant is present in population databases (rs533959068, gnomAD 0.01%). This variant has been observed in individuals with CFTR-related conditions (PMID: 17398169, 23381846). This variant is also known as 1001+5G>A. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 552934). Variants that disrupt the consensus splice site are a relatively common cause of aberrant splicing (PMID: 17576681, 9536098). Studies have shown that this variant results in skipping of exon 7, but is expected to preserve the integrity of the reading-frame (PMID: 23381846). This variant disrupts a region of the CFTR protein in which other variant(s) (p.Arg258Gly) have been determined to be pathogenic (PMID: 7529962, 9305991, 10376575, 11466205, 16196493, 19810821, 23104983). This suggests that this is a clinically significant region of the protein, and that variants that disrupt it are likely to be disease-causing. For these reasons, this variant has been classified as Pathogenic.
Genome-Nilou Lab RCV000668284 SCV001822025 likely pathogenic Cystic fibrosis 2021-07-22 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
Ambry Genetics RCV000668284 SCV003998970 likely pathogenic Cystic fibrosis 2023-06-07 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing The c.869+5G>A intronic variant results from a G to A substitution 5 nucleotides after coding exon 7 in the CFTR gene. This variant has been observed in individuals with CFTR-related conditions (Goh DL et al. J Cyst Fibros, 2007 Nov;6:423-5). Minigene RNA studies have demonstrated that this alteration results in skipping of exon 7 (also reported as exon 6b) (Raynal C et al. Hum Mutat, 2013 May;34:774-84). Of note, this alteration is also known as 1001+5G>A in published literature. Another alteration impacting the same donor site (c.869+3A>T) has been shown to have a similar impact on splicing in skipping of exon 7 and the variant has been identified in individuals diagnosed with classic cystic fibrosis (Schrijver I et al. Am J Med Genet A, 2005 Feb;133A:103-5; Faà V et al. J Mol Diagn, 2006 Sep;8:499-503). This nucleotide position is highly conserved in available vertebrate species. In silico splice site analysis predicts that this alteration will weaken the native splice donor site. Based on the majority of available evidence to date, this variant is likely to be pathogenic.
Baylor Genetics RCV003472096 SCV004213472 likely pathogenic Bronchiectasis with or without elevated sweat chloride 1 2023-07-06 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences RCV003892516 SCV004710575 likely pathogenic CFTR-related condition 2023-11-27 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing The CFTR c.869+5G>A variant is predicted to interfere with splicing. This variant was reported in individuals with congenital absence of vas deferens (described as 1001+5G>A, Goh et al. 2007. PubMed ID: 17398169; Table S1, Fang et al. 2022. PubMed ID: 36437957). A minigene assay showed that this variant results in exon skipping (Raynal et al. 2013. PubMed ID: 23381846). This variant is reported in 0.011% of alleles in individuals of East Asian descent in gnomAD and is interpreted as pathogenic or likely pathogenic by most of the submitters in ClinVar (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/552934/). This variant is interpreted as likely pathogenic.
Natera, Inc. RCV000668284 SCV001454034 likely pathogenic Cystic fibrosis 2020-09-16 no assertion criteria provided clinical testing

The information on this website is not intended for direct diagnostic use or medical decision-making without review by a genetics professional. Individuals should not change their health behavior solely on the basis of information contained on this website. Neither the University of Utah nor the National Institutes of Health independently verfies the submitted information. If you have questions about the information contained on this website, please see a health care professional.