Total submissions: 4
Submitter | RCV | SCV | Clinical significance | Condition | Last evaluated | Review status | Method | Comment |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Color Diagnostics, |
RCV003585729 | SCV004359577 | uncertain significance | Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome | 2021-12-29 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | This missense variant replaces serine with asparagine at codon 669 of the PMS2 protein. Computational prediction suggests that this variant may not impact protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold <= 0.5, PMID: 27666373). To our knowledge, functional studies have not been reported for this variant. This variant has not been reported in individuals affected with hereditary cancer in the literature. This variant has not been identified in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. |
Invitae | RCV003779330 | SCV004661577 | uncertain significance | Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal neoplasms | 2023-12-08 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | This sequence change replaces serine, which is neutral and polar, with asparagine, which is neutral and polar, at codon 669 of the PMS2 protein (p.Ser669Asn). This variant also falls at the last nucleotide of exon 11, which is part of the consensus splice site for this exon. This variant is not present in population databases (gnomAD no frequency). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with PMS2-related conditions. An algorithm developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function (PolyPhen-2) suggests that this variant is likely to be disruptive. Variants that disrupt the consensus splice site are a relatively common cause of aberrant splicing (PMID: 17576681, 9536098). Algorithms developed to predict the effect of sequence changes on RNA splicing suggest that this variant may disrupt the consensus splice site. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. |
All of Us Research Program, |
RCV004011535 | SCV004844103 | uncertain significance | Lynch syndrome | 2023-03-04 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | This missense variant replaces serine with asparagine at codon 669 of the PMS2 protein. Computational prediction suggests that this variant may not impact protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold <= 0.5, PMID: 27666373). To our knowledge, functional studies have not been reported for this variant. This variant has not been reported in individuals affected with hereditary cancer in the literature. This variant has not been identified in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. |
Ambry Genetics | RCV003585729 | SCV005036006 | uncertain significance | Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome | 2023-12-01 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | The c.2006G>A variant (also known as p.S669N), located in coding exon 11 of the PMS2 gene, results from a G to A substitution at nucleotide position 2006. The amino acid change results in serine to asparagine at codon 669, an amino acid with highly similar properties. However, this change occurs in the last base pair of coding exon 11, which makes it likely to have some effect on normal mRNA splicing. This variant is considered to be rare based on population cohorts in the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). This nucleotide position is highly conserved in available vertebrate species. This amino acid position is highly conserved in available vertebrate species. In silico splice site analysis predicts that this alteration will weaken the native splice donor site. In addition, as a missense substitution this is predicted to be tolerated by in silico analysis. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. |