ClinVar Miner

Submissions for variant NM_000539.3(RHO):c.1021G>A (p.Glu341Lys)

dbSNP: rs142322202
Minimum review status: Collection method:
Minimum conflict level:
ClinVar version:
Total submissions: 5
Download table as spreadsheet
Submitter RCV SCV Clinical significance Condition Last evaluated Review status Method Comment
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories RCV001002602 SCV001160575 uncertain significance not specified 2019-05-23 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing The RHO c.1021G>A, p.Glu341Lys variant (rs142322202) is reported in the medical literature in at least one individual with autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa (Gal 1997, Sullivan 2013). The variant is reported in the general population with an allele frequency of 0.0008% (2/246204 alleles), indicating it is not a common polymorphism. The amino acid at this position is highly conserved but computational analyses (SIFT, PolyPhen-2) predict that this variant is tolerated. However, the amino acid at this position is thought to be involved in arrestin binding (Rokoczy 2011). Due to limited clinical and functional information, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain. References: Gal A et al. Rhodopsin Mutations in Inherited Retinal Dystrophies and Dysfunctions. Prog Retin Eye Res 1997 Jan 16(1): 51-79. Rakoczy EP et al. Analysis of Disease-Linked Rhodopsin Mutations Based on Structure, Function, and Protein Stability Calculations. J Mol Biol. 2011 Jan 14;405(2):584-606. Sullivan LS et al. Prevalence of mutations in eyeGENE probands with a diagnosis of autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013 Sep 19;54(9):6255-61.
Blueprint Genetics RCV001073614 SCV001239165 likely pathogenic Retinal dystrophy 2019-07-12 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
Invitae RCV001213688 SCV001385334 likely pathogenic not provided 2023-03-10 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing In summary, the currently available evidence indicates that the variant is pathogenic, but additional data are needed to prove that conclusively. Therefore, this variant has been classified as Likely Pathogenic. Experimental studies are conflicting or provide insufficient evidence to determine the effect of this variant on RHO function (PMID: 30977563). Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) performed at Invitae indicates that this missense variant is not expected to disrupt RHO protein function. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 812033). This missense change has been observed in individuals with clinical features of autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa (Invitae). This variant is present in population databases (rs142322202, gnomAD 0.007%). This sequence change replaces glutamic acid, which is acidic and polar, with lysine, which is basic and polar, at codon 341 of the RHO protein (p.Glu341Lys).
Centre for Genomic Medicine, Manchester, Central Manchester University Hospitals RCV001265168 SCV001443255 uncertain significance Retinitis pigmentosa 4 2020-09-01 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
Ocular Genomics Institute, Massachusetts Eye and Ear RCV001265168 SCV001573688 uncertain significance Retinitis pigmentosa 4 2021-04-08 criteria provided, single submitter research The RHO c.1021G>A variant was identified in an individual with retinitis pigmentosa with a presumed dominant inheritance pattern. Through a review of available evidence we were able to apply the following criteria: PM2, PM1. Based on this evidence we have classified this variant as Variant of Uncertain Significance.

The information on this website is not intended for direct diagnostic use or medical decision-making without review by a genetics professional. Individuals should not change their health behavior solely on the basis of information contained on this website. Neither the University of Utah nor the National Institutes of Health independently verfies the submitted information. If you have questions about the information contained on this website, please see a health care professional.