Total submissions: 14
Submitter | RCV | SCV | Clinical significance | Condition | Last evaluated | Review status | Method | Comment |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pharm |
RCV001787974 | SCV000925241 | drug response | halothane response - Toxicity | 2021-03-24 | reviewed by expert panel | curation | PharmGKB Level of Evidence 1A: Level 1A clinical annotations describe variant-drug combinations that have variant-specific prescribing guidance available in a current clinical guideline annotation or an FDA-approved drug label annotation. Annotations of drug labels or clinical guidelines must give prescribing guidance for specific variants (e.g. CYP2C9*3, HLA-B*57:01) or provide mapping from defined allele functions to diplotypes and phenotypes to be used as supporting evidence for a level 1A clinical annotation. Level 1A clinical annotations must also be supported by at least one publication in addition to a clinical guideline or drug label with variant-specific prescribing guidance. |
Pharm |
RCV001787975 | SCV000925242 | drug response | isoflurane response - Toxicity | 2021-03-24 | reviewed by expert panel | curation | PharmGKB Level of Evidence 1A: Level 1A clinical annotations describe variant-drug combinations that have variant-specific prescribing guidance available in a current clinical guideline annotation or an FDA-approved drug label annotation. Annotations of drug labels or clinical guidelines must give prescribing guidance for specific variants (e.g. CYP2C9*3, HLA-B*57:01) or provide mapping from defined allele functions to diplotypes and phenotypes to be used as supporting evidence for a level 1A clinical annotation. Level 1A clinical annotations must also be supported by at least one publication in addition to a clinical guideline or drug label with variant-specific prescribing guidance. |
Pharm |
RCV001787976 | SCV000925243 | drug response | methoxyflurane response - Toxicity | 2021-03-24 | reviewed by expert panel | curation | PharmGKB Level of Evidence 1A: Level 1A clinical annotations describe variant-drug combinations that have variant-specific prescribing guidance available in a current clinical guideline annotation or an FDA-approved drug label annotation. Annotations of drug labels or clinical guidelines must give prescribing guidance for specific variants (e.g. CYP2C9*3, HLA-B*57:01) or provide mapping from defined allele functions to diplotypes and phenotypes to be used as supporting evidence for a level 1A clinical annotation. Level 1A clinical annotations must also be supported by at least one publication in addition to a clinical guideline or drug label with variant-specific prescribing guidance. |
Pharm |
RCV001787977 | SCV000925244 | drug response | sevoflurane response - Toxicity | 2021-03-24 | reviewed by expert panel | curation | PharmGKB Level of Evidence 1A: Level 1A clinical annotations describe variant-drug combinations that have variant-specific prescribing guidance available in a current clinical guideline annotation or an FDA-approved drug label annotation. Annotations of drug labels or clinical guidelines must give prescribing guidance for specific variants (e.g. CYP2C9*3, HLA-B*57:01) or provide mapping from defined allele functions to diplotypes and phenotypes to be used as supporting evidence for a level 1A clinical annotation. Level 1A clinical annotations must also be supported by at least one publication in addition to a clinical guideline or drug label with variant-specific prescribing guidance. |
Pharm |
RCV001787978 | SCV000925245 | drug response | succinylcholine response - Toxicity | 2021-03-24 | reviewed by expert panel | curation | PharmGKB Level of Evidence 1A: Level 1A clinical annotations describe variant-drug combinations that have variant-specific prescribing guidance available in a current clinical guideline annotation or an FDA-approved drug label annotation. Annotations of drug labels or clinical guidelines must give prescribing guidance for specific variants (e.g. CYP2C9*3, HLA-B*57:01) or provide mapping from defined allele functions to diplotypes and phenotypes to be used as supporting evidence for a level 1A clinical annotation. Level 1A clinical annotations must also be supported by at least one publication in addition to a clinical guideline or drug label with variant-specific prescribing guidance. |
Pharm |
RCV001787972 | SCV000925369 | drug response | desflurane response - Toxicity | 2021-03-24 | reviewed by expert panel | curation | PharmGKB Level of Evidence 1A: Level 1A clinical annotations describe variant-drug combinations that have variant-specific prescribing guidance available in a current clinical guideline annotation or an FDA-approved drug label annotation. Annotations of drug labels or clinical guidelines must give prescribing guidance for specific variants (e.g. CYP2C9*3, HLA-B*57:01) or provide mapping from defined allele functions to diplotypes and phenotypes to be used as supporting evidence for a level 1A clinical annotation. Level 1A clinical annotations must also be supported by at least one publication in addition to a clinical guideline or drug label with variant-specific prescribing guidance. |
Pharm |
RCV001787973 | SCV000925370 | drug response | enflurane response - Toxicity | 2021-03-24 | reviewed by expert panel | curation | PharmGKB Level of Evidence 1A: Level 1A clinical annotations describe variant-drug combinations that have variant-specific prescribing guidance available in a current clinical guideline annotation or an FDA-approved drug label annotation. Annotations of drug labels or clinical guidelines must give prescribing guidance for specific variants (e.g. CYP2C9*3, HLA-B*57:01) or provide mapping from defined allele functions to diplotypes and phenotypes to be used as supporting evidence for a level 1A clinical annotation. Level 1A clinical annotations must also be supported by at least one publication in addition to a clinical guideline or drug label with variant-specific prescribing guidance. |
Clin |
RCV002281943 | SCV002570157 | pathogenic | Malignant hyperthermia, susceptibility to, 1 | 2022-07-10 | reviewed by expert panel | curation | This pathogenicity assessment is relevant only for malignant hyperthermia susceptibility (MHS) inherited in an autosomal dominant pattern. Variants in RYR1 can also cause other myopathies inherited in an autosomal dominant pattern or in an autosomal recessive pattern. Some of these disorders may predispose individuals to malignant hyperthermia. RYR1 variants may also contribute to a malignant hyperthermia reaction in combination with other genetic and non-genetic factors and the clinician needs to consider such factors in making management decisions. This sequence variant predicts a substitution of arginine with histidine at codon 2336 of the RYR1 protein, p.(Arg2336His). This variant was not present in a large population database (gnomAD) at the time this variant was interpreted. This variant has been reported in 26 individuals with a personal or family history of an MH episode and a positive in vitro contracture test (IVCT) or caffeine halothane contracture test (CHCT) result (if the proband was unavailable for testing, a positive diagnostic test result in a mutation-positive relative was counted), PS4 (PMID: 30236257, 19191329, 24433488, 21455645, 23460944, 23558838, 23736090, 31559918). This variant segregates with IVCT status in over 10 individuals (PMID: 30236257, 19191329, 24433488). Functional study in HEK293 cells showed an increased sensitivity to RYR1 agonists, PS3_Moderate (PMID: 28403410). This variant resides in a region of RYR1 considered to be a hotspot for pathogenic variants that contribute to MHS, PM1 (PMID: 21118704). A REVEL score >0.85 (0.903) supports a pathogenic status for this variant, PP3_Moderate. This variant has been classified as Pathogenic. Criteria implemented: PS3_Moderate, PS4, PM1, PP1_Strong, PP3_Moderate. |
Invitae | RCV000554523 | SCV000660010 | pathogenic | RYR1-Related Disorders | 2023-09-13 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | This sequence change replaces arginine, which is basic and polar, with histidine, which is basic and polar, at codon 2336 of the RYR1 protein (p.Arg2336His). This variant is not present in population databases (gnomAD no frequency). This missense change has been observed in individuals with malignant hyperthermia susceptibility (MHS) (PMID: 19191329, 19648156, 21455645, 23476141, 23558838, 24433488). It has also been observed to segregate with disease in related individuals. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 133174). Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) performed at Invitae indicates that this missense variant is expected to disrupt RYR1 protein function. Experimental studies have shown that this missense change affects RYR1 function (PMID: 19191329, 23736090). For these reasons, this variant has been classified as Pathogenic. |
Prevention |
RCV000119673 | SCV000852736 | pathogenic | not provided | 2018-02-27 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | |
Ce |
RCV000119673 | SCV001151860 | likely pathogenic | not provided | 2017-11-01 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | |
Revvity Omics, |
RCV000119673 | SCV002019933 | pathogenic | not provided | 2019-06-10 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | |
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, |
RCV001824615 | SCV002074335 | pathogenic | Malignant hyperthermia of anesthesia | 2022-01-19 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Variant summary: RYR1 c.7007G>A (p.Arg2336His) results in a non-conservative amino acid change located in the RIH domain (IPR000699) of the encoded protein sequence. Five of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant was absent in 251414 control chromosomes (gnomAD). c.7007G>A has been reported in the literature in multiple individuals affected with Malignant Hyperthermia Susceptibility (example: Carpenter_2009, Levano_2009). At least one publication reports experimental evidence evaluating an impact on cellular function where cells from patients carrying the variant showed increased sensativity to RYR agonists like 4-chloro-m-cresol compared to controls (Levano_2009). Five ClinVar submitters, including one expert panel, have assessed the variant since 2014: four submitters classified the variant as pathogenic and the expert panel classified the variant with drug responsive toxicity to various inhalent anesthetics (example: isoflurane, halothane, sevoflurane). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as pathogenic. |
Leiden Muscular Dystrophy |
RCV000119673 | SCV000154580 | not provided | not provided | no assertion provided | not provided |