Total submissions: 7
Submitter | RCV | SCV | Clinical significance | Condition | Last evaluated | Review status | Method | Comment |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Invitae | RCV001086420 | SCV000544479 | benign | Tuberous sclerosis 2 | 2024-01-29 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | |
Ambry Genetics | RCV000572414 | SCV000664736 | benign | Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome | 2020-11-02 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. |
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, |
RCV000589806 | SCV000697477 | uncertain significance | not provided | 2017-06-16 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Variant summary: The TSC2 c.5262C>G (p.Ile1754Met) variant involves the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. 2/3 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. This variant was found in 6/119900 control chromosomes, predominantly observed in the African subpopulation at a frequency of 0.000586 (6/10236). This frequency is about 9 times the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic TSC2 variant (0.0000688), suggesting this is likely a benign polymorphism found primarily in the populations of African origin. In addition, multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories/reputable databases classified this variant as uncertain significance. The variant of interest has not, to our knowledge, been reported in affected individuals via publications nor evaluated for functional impact by in vivo/vitro studies. Because of the absence of clinical information and the lack of functional studies, the variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance - possibly benign variant until additional information becomes available. |
Gene |
RCV000589806 | SCV001935518 | benign | not provided | 2019-02-12 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | |
Genome- |
RCV001086420 | SCV002040268 | benign | Tuberous sclerosis 2 | 2021-11-07 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | |
Sema4, |
RCV000572414 | SCV002534043 | benign | Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome | 2020-11-29 | criteria provided, single submitter | curation | |
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, |
RCV000589806 | SCV001549120 | likely benign | not provided | no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | The TSC2 p.Ile1651Met variant was not identified in the literature nor was it identified in Cosmic or LOVD 3.0. The variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs397515318) and in ClinVar (alias: NM_000548.4:c.5262C>G (p.Ile1754Met); classified as conflicting interpretations of pathogenicity with benign by Invitae and VUS by Ambry Genetics and Integrated Genetics; associated conditions are Tuberous sclerosis 2 and Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome) The variant was identified in control databases in 21 of 281550 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.000075 (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017) and was observed in the following populations: African in 19 of 24858 chromosomes (freq: 0.000764), Latino in 1 of 35422 chromosomes (freq: 0.000028) and European (non-Finnish) in 1 of 128140 chromosomes (freq: 0.000008), while the variant was not observed in the Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, European (Finnish), Other and South Asian populations. The p.Ile1651 residue is conserved in mammals and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) provide inconsistent predictions regarding the impact to the protein; this information is not very predictive of pathogenicity. The p.Ile1651Met variant occurs in the first three bases of the exon. This position has been shown to be part of the splicing consensus sequence and variants involving this position sometimes affect splicing. However, in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. |