ClinVar Miner

Submissions for variant NM_001042492.3(NF1):c.2032C>G (p.Pro678Ala)

gnomAD frequency: 0.00013  dbSNP: rs758691069
Minimum review status: Collection method:
Minimum conflict level:
ClinVar version:
Total submissions: 8
Download table as spreadsheet
Submitter RCV SCV Clinical significance Condition Last evaluated Review status Method Comment
Ambry Genetics RCV000213376 SCV000275676 uncertain significance Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome 2015-05-07 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing The p.P678A variant (also known as c.2032C>G), located in coding exon 18 of the NF1 gene, results from a C to G substitution at nucleotide position 2032. The proline at codon 678 is replaced by alanine, an amino acid with highly similar properties. This amino acid position is highly conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be tolerated by in silico analysis. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of p.P678A remains unclear.
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp RCV000464265 SCV000542220 benign Neurofibromatosis, type 1 2025-02-04 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
Sema4, Sema4 RCV000213376 SCV002527442 uncertain significance Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome 2021-10-21 criteria provided, single submitter curation
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp RCV002265694 SCV002547945 uncertain significance not specified 2022-05-05 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing Variant summary: NF1 c.2032C>G (p.Pro678Ala) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 1.2e-05 in 250606 control chromosomes (gnomAD). The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. To our knowledge, no occurrence of c.2032C>G in individuals affected with Neurofibromatosis Type 1 and no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. Two ClinVar submitters have assessed the variant since 2014: both classified the variant as of uncertain significance. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as uncertain significance.
Genome-Nilou Lab RCV000464265 SCV002561985 uncertain significance Neurofibromatosis, type 1 2022-03-15 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
GeneDx RCV002293429 SCV002586801 uncertain significance not provided 2022-04-20 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 25486365)
St. Jude Molecular Pathology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital RCV000464265 SCV004171440 uncertain significance Neurofibromatosis, type 1 2023-11-28 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing The NF1 c.2032C>G (p.Pro678Ala) change has a maximum subpopulation frequency of 0.020% in gnomAD v2.1.1 (https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org). The in silico tool REVEL predicts a benign effect on protein function, but to our knowledge this prediction has not been confirmed by functional studies. To our knowledge, this variant has not been reported in individuals with Neurofibromatosis type 1. In summary, the evidence currently available is insufficient to determine the clinical significance of this variant. It has therefore been classified as of uncertain significance.
Ambry Genetics RCV004558520 SCV005048609 likely benign Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome; Cardiovascular phenotype 2022-12-09 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity.

The information on this website is not intended for direct diagnostic use or medical decision-making without review by a genetics professional. Individuals should not change their health behavior solely on the basis of information contained on this website. Neither the University of Utah nor the National Institutes of Health independently verfies the submitted information. If you have questions about the information contained on this website, please see a health care professional.