ClinVar Miner

Submissions for variant NM_001048174.2(MUTYH):c.32G>A (p.Gly11Asp)

gnomAD frequency: 0.00044  dbSNP: rs75321043
Minimum review status: Collection method:
Minimum conflict level:
ClinVar version:
Total submissions: 19
Download table as spreadsheet
Submitter RCV SCV Clinical significance Condition Last evaluated Review status Method Comment
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp RCV000123155 SCV000166459 benign Familial adenomatous polyposis 2 2024-02-01 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
Ambry Genetics RCV000129347 SCV000184111 benign Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome 2017-04-03 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity.
GeneDx RCV000034680 SCV000211396 likely benign not provided 2021-06-11 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 18422726, 22641385, 22703879, 11295288, 17252231, 30333958, 29879026, 18811933, 16929514, 25820570, 26684191, 26900293, 25980754, 27443514, 26332594, 24728327, 17703316, 27600092, 29330641, 29667044)
Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Soonchunhyang University Medical Center RCV000123155 SCV000267405 uncertain significance Familial adenomatous polyposis 2 2016-03-18 criteria provided, single submitter reference population
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine RCV000121606 SCV000539815 benign not specified 2016-03-29 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: ExAC: 1.3% (114/8654) East Asian chromosomes; ClinVar: 4 labs classify as VUS
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health RCV000129347 SCV000690606 benign Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome 2016-06-14 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp RCV000034680 SCV000697710 benign not provided 2017-08-21 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing Variant summary: The MUTYH c.74G>A (p.Gly25Asp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. 3/4 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant (SNPsandGO not captured due to low reliability index). This variant was found in the large and broad cohorts of the ExAC project at an allele frequency of 0.001112 (135/121410 chrs tested), predominantly observed in the East Asian subpopulation (0.013; 114/8654 chrs, including 2 homozygotes). This frequency is about 3 times the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic MUTYH variant (0.0045644), suggesting this is likely a benign polymorphism found primarily in the populations of East Asian origin. Most of the published reports indicate that c.74G>A co-occurs in cis with c.53C>T (P18L). Although c.[53C>T; 74G>A] haplotype has been reported to be enriched in sporadic CRC pts compared to controls (Chen, 2008), in functional studies both the complex allele and its compounds were shown to retain complementation ability and were considered to be functionally neutral. In addition, several reported CRC pts carried known pathogenic variants (APC c.3595_3596delAA (p.Lys1199Glufs), MSH6 c.3724_3726del (p.Arg1242del) , that could have explain CRC phenotype in these families (Taki, 2016, Ring, 2012). Lastly, several reputable databases/diagnostic centers classified the variant of interest as VUS/ Benign. Taking together, by applying ACMG rules, the variant was classified as Benign.
Counsyl RCV000123155 SCV000788437 uncertain significance Familial adenomatous polyposis 2 2017-11-13 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences RCV000121606 SCV000806367 benign not specified 2017-08-02 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
Mendelics RCV000123155 SCV001135267 benign Familial adenomatous polyposis 2 2019-05-28 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen RCV000034680 SCV001147275 benign not provided 2024-06-01 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing MUTYH: BS1, BS2
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories RCV000034680 SCV001159515 benign not provided 2023-04-28 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina RCV000123155 SCV001257715 uncertain significance Familial adenomatous polyposis 2 2017-04-27 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance.
Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano RCV000034680 SCV001469577 likely benign not provided 2023-06-29 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
Sema4, Sema4 RCV000129347 SCV002532328 benign Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome 2020-08-18 criteria provided, single submitter curation
Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital RCV000121606 SCV002552531 uncertain significance not specified 2024-07-31 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
Biesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of Health RCV000034680 SCV000043379 variant of unknown significance not provided 2012-07-13 no assertion criteria provided research Converted during submission to Uncertain significance.
ITMI RCV000121606 SCV000085804 not provided not specified 2013-09-19 no assertion provided reference population
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System RCV001353637 SCV000592675 uncertain significance Carcinoma of colon no assertion criteria provided clinical testing The p.Gly25Asp variant was identified in the literature in 18 of 896 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.020) from Asian individuals (Korean, Chinese, Japanese) with adenomatous polyposis or colorectal cancer, and was present in 6 of 944 control chromosomes (frequency: 0.006) (Chen 2008, Kim 2007, Yanaru-Fujisawa 2008, Zhang 2006). In all these studies, the variant was identified in co-occurrence on the same allele as another MUTYH variant, p.Pro18Leu. Two studies suggest that this haplotype variant allele (containing both p.Pro18Leu and p.Gly25Asp variants) increases the risk of gastric cancer, with significantly higher frequencies of the variant haplotype observed in affected cases than in healthy controls (Chen 2008, Zhang 2006). In addition, a functional study by Chen (2008) found that the haplotype variant allele had a partial effect on protein mitochondrial transport as compared to wild type MUTYH protein. This effect, however, was not found when each variant was tested individually, suggesting an additive effect of the combined variants on the mitochondrial targeting sequences domain of the MUTYH protein. The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs75321043) “With allele of Uncertain significance” with a minor allele frequency of 0.003 (1000 Genomes Project), in HGMD, and in the “InSiGHT Colon Cancer Database”. The p.Gly25 residue is not conserved in mammals and four out of five computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein. However, this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. In summary, based on the above information, the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance (VUS).

The information on this website is not intended for direct diagnostic use or medical decision-making without review by a genetics professional. Individuals should not change their health behavior solely on the basis of information contained on this website. Neither the University of Utah nor the National Institutes of Health independently verfies the submitted information. If you have questions about the information contained on this website, please see a health care professional.