ClinVar Miner

Submissions for variant NM_001048174.2(MUTYH):c.606+1G>T

dbSNP: rs878854193
Minimum review status: Collection method:
Minimum conflict level:
ClinVar version:
Total submissions: 4
Download table as spreadsheet
Submitter RCV SCV Clinical significance Condition Last evaluated Review status Method Comment
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp RCV000230698 SCV000285961 likely pathogenic Familial adenomatous polyposis 2 2023-05-27 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing In summary, the currently available evidence indicates that the variant is pathogenic, but additional data are needed to prove that conclusively. Therefore, this variant has been classified as Likely Pathogenic. Algorithms developed to predict the effect of sequence changes on RNA splicing suggest that this variant may disrupt the consensus splice site. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 238352). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with MUTYH-related conditions. This variant is not present in population databases (gnomAD no frequency). This sequence change affects a donor splice site in intron 8 of the MUTYH gene. It is expected to disrupt RNA splicing. Variants that disrupt the donor or acceptor splice site typically lead to a loss of protein function (PMID: 16199547), and loss-of-function variants in MUTYH are known to be pathogenic (PMID: 18534194, 20663686).
GeneDx RCV000482610 SCV000571605 likely pathogenic not provided 2016-09-07 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing This variant is denoted MUTYH c.690+1G>T or IVS8+1G>T and consists of a G>T nucleotide substitution at the +1 position of intron 8 of the MUTYH gene. Although this variant destroys a canonical splice acceptor site and is predicted to cause abnormal splicing of exon 8, the skipping of exon 8 is predicted to be an in-frame event. While this particular variant has not, to our knowledge, been published in the literature, a nearby exonic variant, MUTYH c.690G>A, has been shown to result in skipping of exon 8 (Dallosso 2008). Importantly, Dellosso et al. (2008) reported that MUTYH c.690G>A has occurred in trans with MUTYH Tyr179Cys, one of the two common MUTYH pathogenic variants, in two individuals presenting with a phenotype consistent with MUTYH-Associated Polyposis (MAP), thus supporting that the skipping of exon 8 is deleterious. Based on the currently available information, we consider MUTYH c.690+1G>T to be a likely pathogenic variant.
Ambry Genetics RCV002372265 SCV002667785 likely pathogenic Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome 2022-04-12 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing The c.690+1G>T intronic variant results from a G to T substitution one nucleotide after coding exon 8 of the MUTYH gene. Alterations that disrupt the canonical splice site are expected to result in aberrant splicing. In silico splice site analysis predicts that this alteration will weaken the native splice donor site; however, direct evidence is insufficient at this time (Ambry internal data). The resulting transcript is predicted to be in-frame and is not expected to trigger nonsense-mediated mRNAdecay; however, direct evidence is unavailable. The exact functional effect of the altered amino acid sequence is unknown; however, the impacted region is critical for protein function (Ambry internal data). This variant is considered to be rare based on population cohorts in the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). This nucleotide position is highly conserved in available vertebrate species. Based on the majority of available evidence to date, this variant is likely to be pathogenic.
Baylor Genetics RCV000230698 SCV004198962 likely pathogenic Familial adenomatous polyposis 2 2023-05-04 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing

The information on this website is not intended for direct diagnostic use or medical decision-making without review by a genetics professional. Individuals should not change their health behavior solely on the basis of information contained on this website. Neither the University of Utah nor the National Institutes of Health independently verfies the submitted information. If you have questions about the information contained on this website, please see a health care professional.