ClinVar Miner

Submissions for variant NM_001086521.2(NDUFAF8):c.195+271C>T

gnomAD frequency: 0.00063  dbSNP: rs745332456
Minimum review status: Collection method:
Minimum conflict level:
ClinVar version:
Total submissions: 8
Download table as spreadsheet
Submitter RCV SCV Clinical significance Condition Last evaluated Review status Method Comment
Wellcome Centre for Mitochondrial Research, Newcastle University RCV000984080 SCV000995083 pathogenic Mitochondrial disease 2019-10-09 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp RCV001003490 SCV001737627 likely pathogenic Mitochondrial complex 1 deficiency, nuclear type 34 2021-05-21 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing Variant summary: C17ORF89 (NDUFAF8) c.195+271C>T is located at a position not widely known to affect splicing. However, several computational tools predict a significant impact on normal splicing: Three predict the variant strengthens a cryptic intronic 5 donor site. Experimental evidence demonstrated this variant was associated with an mRNA defect leading to loss of the functionally relevant transcript (Alston_2020). The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00062 in 150992 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.0012 within the Non-Finnish European subpopulation in the gnomAD v3.1.1 database. Due to an unknown prevalence of C17ORF89 associated Mitochondrial Complex 1 Deficiency, this frequency relative to that expected for a pathogenic variant in C17ORF89 is unknown, allowing no conclusion about variant significance. c.195+271C>T has been reported in the literature in two comprehensively genotyped compound heterozygous individuals affected with Mitochondrial Complex 1 Deficiency (Alston_2020). Experimental evidence derived from studies on fibroblasts and muscle cells from one of these individuals indicated a decrease in complex I activity, a reduction in oxidative capacity, decreased levels of fully assembled complex I and a generalized reduction in complex I subunits (Alston_2020). These data indicate that the variant may be associated with disease. Two ClinVar submitters (evaluation after 2014) cite the variant as pathogenic. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely pathogenic.
Undiagnosed Diseases Network, NIH RCV001003490 SCV002523170 pathogenic Mitochondrial complex 1 deficiency, nuclear type 34 2022-03-30 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen RCV002275160 SCV002563447 likely pathogenic not provided 2024-08-01 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing NDUFAF8: PM3:Strong, PM2, PS3:Supporting
Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute RCV001003490 SCV002769042 likely pathogenic Mitochondrial complex 1 deficiency, nuclear type 34 2022-02-02 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing Based on the classification scheme VCGS_Germline_v1.3.4, this variant is classified as Likely pathogenic. Following criteria are met: 0102 - Loss of function is a known mechanism of disease in this gene and is associated with mitochondrial complex I deficiency, nuclear type 34 (MIM#618776). (I) 0106 - This gene is associated with autosomal recessive disease. (I) 0209 - Splice site variant proven to affect splicing of the transcript with uncertain effect on protein sequence. Functional analysis of patient fibroblasts shows this variant results in intron retention and the loss of isoform 2. However, the exact protein outcome is unclear as this would be expected to result in a truncated protein (PMID: 31866046). (SP) 0252 - This variant is homozygous. (I) 0304 - Variant is present in gnomAD (v3) <0.01 for a recessive condition (93 heterozygotes, 0 homozygotes). (SP) 0705 - No comparable intronic variants have previous evidence for pathogenicity. (I) 0802 - This variant has moderate previous evidence of pathogenicity in unrelated individuals. This variant has been described as likely pathogenic and pathogenic, and observed in two unrelated compound heterozygous individuals with Leigh syndrome and complex I deficiency (ClinVar, PMID: 31866046). (SP) 0905 - No published segregation evidence has been identified for this variant. (I) 1007 - No published functional evidence has been identified for this variant. (I) 1208 - Inheritance information for this variant is not currently available in this individual. (I) Legend: (SP) - Supporting pathogenic, (I) - Information, (SB) - Supporting benign
Baylor Genetics RCV001003490 SCV003836428 pathogenic Mitochondrial complex 1 deficiency, nuclear type 34 2022-03-30 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
OMIM RCV001003490 SCV001161786 pathogenic Mitochondrial complex 1 deficiency, nuclear type 34 2020-04-07 no assertion criteria provided literature only
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences RCV004754579 SCV005345606 likely pathogenic NDUFAF8-related disorder 2024-06-06 no assertion criteria provided clinical testing The NDUFAF8 c.199+267C>T variant is predicted to interfere with splicing. This variant, also reported as c.195+271C>T in transcript NM_001086521, has been reported in two unrelated individuals with a clinical diagnosis of Leigh syndrome (subjects 1 and 2, Alston et al. 2019. PubMed ID: 31866046). In vitro studies from subject 1's fibroblast cells demonstrated expression of this variant results in aberrant splicing, a reduction in oxidative capacity, as well as decreased levels of fully assembled complex I in both muscle cells and fibroblasts compared to controls (Figures S3, S4 and 3, Alston et al. 2019. PubMed ID: 31866046). Additionally, a rescue assay demonstrated that this phenotype could be corrected by a reintroduction of wildtype (Figure 3, Alston et al. 2019. PubMed ID: 31866046). This variant is reported in 0.12% of alleles in individuals of European (non-Finnish) descent in gnomAD. This variant is interpreted as likely pathogenic.

The information on this website is not intended for direct diagnostic use or medical decision-making without review by a genetics professional. Individuals should not change their health behavior solely on the basis of information contained on this website. Neither the University of Utah nor the National Institutes of Health independently verfies the submitted information. If you have questions about the information contained on this website, please see a health care professional.