ClinVar Miner

Submissions for variant NM_001110792.2(MECP2):c.-31AG[2]

dbSNP: rs587783128
Minimum review status: Collection method:
Minimum conflict level:
ClinVar version:
Total submissions: 7
Download table as spreadsheet
Submitter RCV SCV Clinical significance Condition Last evaluated Review status Method Comment
ClinGen Rett and Angelman-like Disorders Variant Curation Expert Panel RCV002260622 SCV002540698 benign Rett syndrome 2022-02-18 reviewed by expert panel curation The allele frequency of the c.-187_-186del variant in MECP2 (NM_004992.3) is 0.058% in European (non-Finnish) sub population and 0.033% in African/African-American sub population in gnomAD, which is high enough to be classified as benign based on thresholds defined by the ClinGen Rett/Angelman-like Expert Panel for Rett/AS-like conditions (BA1). In summary, the c.-187_-186del variant in MECP2 is classified as benign based on the ACMG/AMP criteria (BA1).
GeneDx RCV000144799 SCV000191024 likely benign not specified 2017-11-02 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease.
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp RCV000144799 SCV001362256 benign not specified 2019-05-17 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing Variant summary: MECP2 c.-187_-186delAG is located in the untranslated mRNA region upstream of the initiation codon. 5/5 computational tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00025 in 44218 control chromosomes (gnomAD). The observed variant frequency is approximately 30 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in MECP2 causing Rett Syndrome phenotype (8.3e-06), strongly suggesting that the variant is benign. To our knowledge, no occurrence of c.-187_-186delAG in individuals affected with Rett Syndrome and no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. One clinical diagnostic laboratory has submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation and classified the variant as likely benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign.
Invitae RCV001522613 SCV001732188 benign Severe neonatal-onset encephalopathy with microcephaly 2022-11-03 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago RCV000144799 SCV002066933 likely benign not specified 2017-11-08 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
Centre for Population Genomics, CPG RCV002260622 SCV004098713 benign Rett syndrome 2023-08-14 criteria provided, single submitter curation This variant has been collected from RettBASE and curated to current modified ACMG/AMP criteria.Based on the classification scheme defined by the ClinGen Rett/Angelman-like Expert Panel for Rett/AS-like Disorders Specifications to the ACMG/AMP Variant Interpretation Guidelines VCEP 2.0, this variant is classified as Benign. At least the following criteria are met: The allele frequency of this variant in at least one population in gnomAD is higher than the 0.03% threshold defined by the ClinGen Rett/Angelman-like Expert Panel for Rett/AS-like Disorders VCEP 2.0 (BA1).
RettBASE RCV000170283 SCV000222615 uncertain significance X-linked intellectual disability-psychosis-macroorchidism syndrome 2007-11-01 no assertion criteria provided curation

The information on this website is not intended for direct diagnostic use or medical decision-making without review by a genetics professional. Individuals should not change their health behavior solely on the basis of information contained on this website. Neither the University of Utah nor the National Institutes of Health independently verfies the submitted information. If you have questions about the information contained on this website, please see a health care professional.