Total submissions: 11
Submitter | RCV | SCV | Clinical significance | Condition | Last evaluated | Review status | Method | Comment |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Eurofins Ntd Llc |
RCV000153212 | SCV000202686 | likely benign | not specified | 2014-05-02 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | |
Ce |
RCV000584981 | SCV000693215 | uncertain significance | not provided | 2017-07-01 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | |
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, |
RCV000625442 | SCV000745362 | likely benign | Retinitis pigmentosa 25 | 2015-09-28 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | |
Labcorp Genetics |
RCV000584981 | SCV001116323 | likely benign | not provided | 2024-01-30 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | |
Illumina Laboratory Services, |
RCV001164682 | SCV001326823 | uncertain significance | Retinitis pigmentosa | 2017-04-27 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. |
Genome- |
RCV000625442 | SCV001652728 | likely benign | Retinitis pigmentosa 25 | 2021-05-18 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | |
Dept Of Ophthalmology, |
RCV003888588 | SCV004707495 | uncertain significance | Retinal dystrophy | 2023-10-01 | criteria provided, single submitter | research | |
Natera, |
RCV001164682 | SCV001459619 | likely benign | Retinitis pigmentosa | 2020-01-05 | no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | |
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, |
RCV000584981 | SCV001548971 | likely benign | not provided | no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | The EYS p.Asp1662Val variant was not identified in the literature but was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs147641443), ClinVar (classified as likely benign by EGL Genetics and DNA and Cytogenetics Diagnostics Unit, Erasmus Medical Center and as a VUS by CeGaT Praxis fuer Humangenetik Tuebingen) and LOVD 3.0 (classified as likely benign and benign). The variant was also identified in control databases in 390 of 183042 chromosomes (1 homozygous) at a frequency of 0.002131 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: European (Finnish) in 65 of 18416 chromosomes (freq: 0.00353), European (non-Finnish) in 205 of 73290 chromosomes (freq: 0.002797), Other in 14 of 5366 chromosomes (freq: 0.002609), Latino in 51 of 25484 chromosomes (freq: 0.002001), South Asian in 40 of 22754 chromosomes (freq: 0.001758), African in 13 of 16570 chromosomes (freq: 0.000785) and East Asian in 2 of 12444 chromosomes (freq: 0.000161), but was not observed in the Ashkenazi Jewish population. The p.Asp1662 residue is not conserved in mammals and four out of five computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein; however, this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and two of four in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) predict a greater than 10% difference in splicing; this is not very predictive of pathogenicity. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. | |
Clinical Genetics, |
RCV000153212 | SCV001917854 | benign | not specified | no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | ||
Prevention |
RCV003965140 | SCV004790645 | likely benign | EYS-related disorder | 2020-12-16 | no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). |