ClinVar Miner

Submissions for variant NM_001142800.2(EYS):c.4985A>T (p.Asp1662Val)

gnomAD frequency: 0.00192  dbSNP: rs147641443
Minimum review status: Collection method:
Minimum conflict level:
ClinVar version:
Total submissions: 11
Download table as spreadsheet
Submitter RCV SCV Clinical significance Condition Last evaluated Review status Method Comment
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) RCV000153212 SCV000202686 likely benign not specified 2014-05-02 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen RCV000584981 SCV000693215 uncertain significance not provided 2017-07-01 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center RCV000625442 SCV000745362 likely benign Retinitis pigmentosa 25 2015-09-28 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp RCV000584981 SCV001116323 likely benign not provided 2024-01-30 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina RCV001164682 SCV001326823 uncertain significance Retinitis pigmentosa 2017-04-27 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance.
Genome-Nilou Lab RCV000625442 SCV001652728 likely benign Retinitis pigmentosa 25 2021-05-18 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
Dept Of Ophthalmology, Nagoya University RCV003888588 SCV004707495 uncertain significance Retinal dystrophy 2023-10-01 criteria provided, single submitter research
Natera, Inc. RCV001164682 SCV001459619 likely benign Retinitis pigmentosa 2020-01-05 no assertion criteria provided clinical testing
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System RCV000584981 SCV001548971 likely benign not provided no assertion criteria provided clinical testing The EYS p.Asp1662Val variant was not identified in the literature but was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs147641443), ClinVar (classified as likely benign by EGL Genetics and DNA and Cytogenetics Diagnostics Unit, Erasmus Medical Center and as a VUS by CeGaT Praxis fuer Humangenetik Tuebingen) and LOVD 3.0 (classified as likely benign and benign). The variant was also identified in control databases in 390 of 183042 chromosomes (1 homozygous) at a frequency of 0.002131 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: European (Finnish) in 65 of 18416 chromosomes (freq: 0.00353), European (non-Finnish) in 205 of 73290 chromosomes (freq: 0.002797), Other in 14 of 5366 chromosomes (freq: 0.002609), Latino in 51 of 25484 chromosomes (freq: 0.002001), South Asian in 40 of 22754 chromosomes (freq: 0.001758), African in 13 of 16570 chromosomes (freq: 0.000785) and East Asian in 2 of 12444 chromosomes (freq: 0.000161), but was not observed in the Ashkenazi Jewish population. The p.Asp1662 residue is not conserved in mammals and four out of five computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein; however, this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and two of four in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) predict a greater than 10% difference in splicing; this is not very predictive of pathogenicity. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign.
Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center RCV000153212 SCV001917854 benign not specified no assertion criteria provided clinical testing
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences RCV003965140 SCV004790645 likely benign EYS-related disorder 2020-12-16 no assertion criteria provided clinical testing This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications).

The information on this website is not intended for direct diagnostic use or medical decision-making without review by a genetics professional. Individuals should not change their health behavior solely on the basis of information contained on this website. Neither the University of Utah nor the National Institutes of Health independently verfies the submitted information. If you have questions about the information contained on this website, please see a health care professional.