Total submissions: 9
Submitter | RCV | SCV | Clinical significance | Condition | Last evaluated | Review status | Method | Comment |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Invitae | RCV000815788 | SCV000956260 | pathogenic | not provided | 2024-01-11 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | This sequence change affects a donor splice site in intron 36 of the EYS gene. It is expected to disrupt RNA splicing. Variants that disrupt the donor or acceptor splice site typically lead to a loss of protein function (PMID: 16199547), and loss-of-function variants in EYS are known to be pathogenic (PMID: 18836446, 20333770). This variant is present in population databases (rs758899480, gnomAD 0.04%). Disruption of this splice site has been observed in individuals with retinitis pigmentosa (PMID: 27375351). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 658881). Algorithms developed to predict the effect of sequence changes on RNA splicing suggest that this variant may disrupt the consensus splice site. For these reasons, this variant has been classified as Pathogenic. |
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, |
RCV001271841 | SCV001519435 | pathogenic | Retinitis pigmentosa | 2021-03-09 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Variant summary: EYS c.7228+1G>A is located in a canonical splice-site and is predicted to affect mRNA splicing resulting in a significantly altered protein due to either exon skipping, shortening, or inclusion of intronic material. Several computational tools predict a significant impact on normal splicing: Four predict that the variant abolishes a 5-prime splicing donor site. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 2.7e-05 in 112460 control chromosomes. c.7228+1G>A has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Retinitis Pigmentosa (e.g. Xu_2014, Gu_2016, Messchaert_2018, Wang_2019). These data indicate that the variant is likely to be associated with disease. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Two other clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. Both laboratories cited the variant as pathogenic. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as pathogenic. |
Ocular Genomics Institute, |
RCV001376457 | SCV001573605 | pathogenic | Retinitis pigmentosa 25 | 2021-04-08 | criteria provided, single submitter | research | The EYS c.7228+1G>A variant was identified in an individual with retinitis pigmentosa with a presumed recessive inheritance pattern. Through a review of available evidence we were able to apply the following criteria: PVS1, PM2, PS1. Based on this evidence we have classified this variant as Pathogenic. |
MGZ Medical Genetics Center | RCV001376457 | SCV002580691 | pathogenic | Retinitis pigmentosa 25 | 2022-04-11 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | |
Revvity Omics, |
RCV001376457 | SCV003823944 | pathogenic | Retinitis pigmentosa 25 | 2022-11-15 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | |
Baylor Genetics | RCV001376457 | SCV004195242 | pathogenic | Retinitis pigmentosa 25 | 2023-07-22 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | |
Natera, |
RCV001271841 | SCV001453311 | pathogenic | Retinitis pigmentosa | 2020-09-16 | no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | |
Clinical Genetics, |
RCV000815788 | SCV001921613 | pathogenic | not provided | no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | ||
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, |
RCV000815788 | SCV001957109 | pathogenic | not provided | no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing |