ClinVar Miner

Submissions for variant NM_001164508.2(NEB):c.571G>C (p.Glu191Gln)

gnomAD frequency: 0.01624  dbSNP: rs35686968
Minimum review status: Collection method:
Minimum conflict level:
ClinVar version:
Total submissions: 11
Download table as spreadsheet
Submitter RCV SCV Clinical significance Condition Last evaluated Review status Method Comment
Genetic Services Laboratory,University of Chicago RCV000117763 SCV000152020 uncertain significance not provided 2013-08-23 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
PreventionGenetics,PreventionGenetics RCV000250977 SCV000307367 benign not specified criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
GeneDx RCV000250977 SCV000519544 benign not specified 2016-05-31 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease.
Invitae RCV000552723 SCV000640823 benign Nemaline myopathy 2 2021-12-18 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp RCV000250977 SCV000917877 benign not specified 2018-08-06 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing Variant summary: NEB c.571G>C (p.Glu191Gln) results in a conservative amino acid change located in the Nebulin repeat region of the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.016 in 276052 control chromosomes in the gnomAD database, including 81 homozygotes. The observed variant frequency is approximately 4.65 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in NEB causing Nemaline Myopathy 2 phenotype (0.0035), strongly suggesting that the variant is benign. To our knowledge, no occurrence of c.571G>C in individuals affected with Nemaline Myopathy 2 and no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. Two ClinVar submissions from other clinical diagnostic laboratories (evaluation after 2014) cites variant as "benign." Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign.
Illumina Laboratory Services,Illumina RCV000552723 SCV001295501 benign Nemaline myopathy 2 2018-01-12 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease.
Athena Diagnostics Inc RCV000250977 SCV001476699 benign not specified 2020-01-24 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
Genome-Nilou Lab RCV000552723 SCV001716399 benign Nemaline myopathy 2 2021-05-18 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
Natera, Inc. RCV000552723 SCV001457275 benign Nemaline myopathy 2 2020-06-08 no assertion criteria provided clinical testing
Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) RCV000117763 SCV001798916 likely benign not provided no assertion criteria provided clinical testing
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht RCV000250977 SCV001927085 benign not specified no assertion criteria provided clinical testing

The information on this website is not intended for direct diagnostic use or medical decision-making without review by a genetics professional. Individuals should not change their health behavior solely on the basis of information contained on this website. Neither the University of Utah nor the National Institutes of Health independently verfies the submitted information. If you have questions about the information contained on this website, please see a health care professional.