Total submissions: 2
| Submitter | RCV | SCV | Clinical significance | Condition | Last evaluated | Review status | Method | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Labcorp Genetics |
RCV001321826 | SCV001512675 | uncertain significance | Early infantile epileptic encephalopathy with suppression bursts | 2021-08-30 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | This sequence change replaces arginine with cysteine at codon 136 of the SLC25A22 protein (p.Arg136Cys). The arginine residue is highly conserved and there is a large physicochemical difference between arginine and cysteine. This variant is not present in population databases (ExAC no frequency). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with SLC25A22-related conditions. Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function are either unavailable or do not agree on the potential impact of this missense change (SIFT: "Deleterious"; PolyPhen-2: "Probably Damaging"; Align-GVGD: "Class C15"). In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. |
| Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, |
RCV001357719 | SCV001553272 | uncertain significance | not provided | no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | The SLC25A22 p.Arg136Cys variant was not identified in the literature nor was it identified in dbSNP, ClinVar, Cosmic, LOVD 3.0 or in the following control databases: the 1000 Genomes Project, the NHLBI GO Exome Sequencing Project, the Exome Aggregation Consortium (August 8th 2016), or the Genome Aggregation Database (Feb 27, 2017). The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and 3 of 4 in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE) do not predict a change in splicing. The p.Arg136 residue is conserved in mammals but not in more distantly related organisms, and four out of five computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) suggest that the variant may impact the protein; however, this information is not predictive enough to assume pathogenicity. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time. This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance. |