ClinVar Miner

Submissions for variant NM_001211.6(BUB1B):c.3094A>C (p.Asn1032His)

gnomAD frequency: 0.00077  dbSNP: rs34700927
Minimum review status: Collection method:
Minimum conflict level:
ClinVar version:
Total submissions: 10
Download table as spreadsheet
Submitter RCV SCV Clinical significance Condition Last evaluated Review status Method Comment
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp RCV001294084 SCV000541109 benign Mosaic variegated aneuploidy syndrome 1 2025-01-30 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
Baylor Genetics RCV001294084 SCV001482890 uncertain significance Mosaic variegated aneuploidy syndrome 1 2019-02-21 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing This variant was determined to be of uncertain significance according to ACMG Guidelines, 2015 [PMID:25741868].
GeneDx RCV001357136 SCV002005219 uncertain significance not provided 2020-01-16 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing In silico analysis, which includes protein predictors and evolutionary conservation, supports that this variant does not alter protein structure/function; Observed in individuals with pancreatic cancer (Shindo 2017); This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 28767289)
Institute for Clinical Genetics, University Hospital TU Dresden, University Hospital TU Dresden RCV001357136 SCV002010625 uncertain significance not provided 2021-11-03 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
St. Jude Molecular Pathology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital RCV001294084 SCV003842966 uncertain significance Mosaic variegated aneuploidy syndrome 1 2025-02-05 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing The BUB1B c.3094A>C (p.Asn1032His) missense change has a maximum subpopulation frequency of 0.13% in gnomAD v2.1.1 including 1 homozygote (https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/). The in silico tool REVEL predicts a benign effect on protein function, but to our knowledge this prediction has not been confirmed by functional studies. To our knowledge, this variant has not been reported in individuals with mosaic variegated aneuploidy syndrome. In summary, the evidence currently available is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in mosaic variegated aneuploidy syndrome. It has therefore been classified as of uncertain significance.
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System RCV001357136 SCV001552504 uncertain significance not provided no assertion criteria provided clinical testing The BUB1B p.Asn1032His variant was not identified in the literature nor was it identified in the Cosmic database. The variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs34700927) as "With Uncertain significance allele" as well as in Clinvar as uncertain significance by one submitter, Invitae. The condition associated with this variant is Mosaic variegated aneuploidy syndrome. In the LOVD 3.0 database, the variant is classified as likely benign and probably does not affect protein function according to three submitters. The variant was identified in control databases in 201 of 282894 chromosomes (1 homozygous) at a frequency of 0.000711 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: European (non-Finnish) in 172 of 129200 chromosomes (freq: 0.001331), Other in 8 of 7226 chromosomes (freq: 0.001107), Latino in 10 of 35440 chromosomes (freq: 0.000282), European (Finnish) in 5 of 25122 chromosomes (freq: 0.000199), Ashkenazi Jewish in 2 of 10370 chromosomes (freq: 0.000193), African in 4 of 24970 chromosomes (freq: 0.00016); it was not observed in the East Asian, South Asian, populations. The variant was also identified in the following databases: the NHLBI GO Exome Sequencing Project and the Exome Aggregation Consortium (August 8th 2016). The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, and GeneSplicer) do not predict a difference in splicing. The p.Asn1032 residue is conserved in mammals but not in more distantly related organisms, however four out of five computational analyses (SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, and MutationTaster) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein; this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time. This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance.
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center RCV001357136 SCV001807930 likely benign not provided no assertion criteria provided clinical testing
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht RCV001357136 SCV001932771 likely benign not provided no assertion criteria provided clinical testing
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center RCV001357136 SCV001965660 likely benign not provided no assertion criteria provided clinical testing
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences RCV004754434 SCV005352533 uncertain significance BUB1B-related disorder 2024-04-26 no assertion criteria provided clinical testing The BUB1B c.3094A>C variant is predicted to result in the amino acid substitution p.Asn1032His. To our knowledge, this variant has not been reported in the literature in an individual with mosaic variegated aneuploidy syndrome (MVA). This variant has been reported in six individuals in a large pancreatic cancer cohort (Shindo et al. 2017. PubMed ID: 28767289), but it is unclear at this time whether heterozygous germline BUB1B variants are associated with an increased risk of pancreatic cancer. This variant is reported in 0.13% of alleles in individuals of European (Non-Finnish) descent in gnomAD, including one homozygote, and has conflicting interpretations in ClinVar ranging from benign to uncertain (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/403757/). Although we suspect that this variant may be benign, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain at this time due to the absence of conclusive functional and genetic evidence.

The information on this website is not intended for direct diagnostic use or medical decision-making without review by a genetics professional. Individuals should not change their health behavior solely on the basis of information contained on this website. Neither the University of Utah nor the National Institutes of Health independently verfies the submitted information. If you have questions about the information contained on this website, please see a health care professional.