ClinVar Miner

Submissions for variant NM_001271208.2(NEB):c.10809G>C (p.Trp3603Cys) (rs10172023)

Minimum review status: Collection method:
Minimum conflict level:
ClinVar version:
Total submissions: 8
Download table as spreadsheet
Submitter RCV SCV Clinical significance Condition Last evaluated Review status Method Comment
EGL Genetic Diagnostics,Eurofins Clinical Diagnostics RCV000081108 SCV000113016 benign not specified 2014-05-07 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Partners HealthCare Personalized Medicine RCV000081108 SCV000269408 benign not specified 2014-11-26 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing p.Trp3603Cys in exon 73 of NEB: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance because it has been identified in 33% (2784/8400) of European America n chromosomes by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http://evs.gs.washington.ed u/EVS/; dbSNP rs10172023).
PreventionGenetics,PreventionGenetics RCV000081108 SCV000307190 benign not specified criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
Illumina Clinical Services Laboratory,Illumina RCV000986839 SCV000416940 benign Nemaline myopathy 2 2018-01-13 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease.
GeneDx RCV000081108 SCV000519520 benign not specified 2016-01-05 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease.
Integrated Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America RCV000588815 SCV000697800 benign not provided 2017-04-24 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing Variant summary: The NEB c.10809G>C (p.Trp3603Cys) variant involves the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide and 3/3 in silico tools (SNPsandGo and Mutation Taster not captured here due to low reliability index and p-value, respectively) predict a damaging outcome. This variant was found in 34849/120540 control chromosomes (5272 homozygotes) at a frequency of 0.2891074, which is approximately 82 times the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic NEB variant (0.0035355), suggesting this variant is likely a benign polymorphism. In addition, multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories/reputable databases classified this variant as likely benign/benign. Therefore, the variant of interest has been classified as Benign.
Mendelics RCV000986839 SCV001135978 benign Nemaline myopathy 2 2019-05-28 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
Genetic Services Laboratory,University of Chicago RCV000081108 SCV000151968 likely benign not specified no assertion criteria provided clinical testing Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed.

The information on this website is not intended for direct diagnostic use or medical decision-making without review by a genetics professional. Individuals should not change their health behavior solely on the basis of information contained on this website. Neither the University of Utah nor the National Institutes of Health independently verfies the submitted information. If you have questions about the information contained on this website, please see a health care professional.