ClinVar Miner

Submissions for variant NM_001354604.2(MITF):c.1179+4C>T

gnomAD frequency: 0.00003  dbSNP: rs749869303
Minimum review status: Collection method:
Minimum conflict level:
ClinVar version:
Total submissions: 6
Download table as spreadsheet
Submitter RCV SCV Clinical significance Condition Last evaluated Review status Method Comment
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine RCV000615376 SCV000731337 uncertain significance not specified 2017-01-19 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing The c.1161+4C>T variant in MITF has not been previously reported in individuals with hearing loss. It has been identified in 23/65822 European chromosomes by th e Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute.org; dbSNP rs74 9869303). Although this variant has been seen in the general population, its fre quency is not high enough to rule out a pathogenic role. This variant is locate d in the 5' splice region. Computational tools do not suggest an impact to splic ing. However, this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicit y. In summary, the clinical significance of the c.1161+4C>T variant is uncertain .
GeneDx RCV001591370 SCV001824282 likely benign not provided 2018-06-29 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital RCV000615376 SCV002550868 likely benign not specified 2023-08-15 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp RCV002531674 SCV003498475 uncertain significance Tietz syndrome; Waardenburg syndrome type 2A; Melanoma, cutaneous malignant, susceptibility to, 8 2024-01-28 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing This sequence change falls in intron 8 of the MITF gene. It does not directly change the encoded amino acid sequence of the MITF protein. It affects a nucleotide within the consensus splice site. This variant is present in population databases (rs749869303, gnomAD 0.03%). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with MITF-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 517197). Variants that disrupt the consensus splice site are a relatively common cause of aberrant splicing (PMID: 17576681, 9536098). Algorithms developed to predict the effect of sequence changes on RNA splicing suggest that this variant is not likely to affect RNA splicing. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance.
St. Jude Molecular Pathology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital RCV003230270 SCV003928103 uncertain significance Melanoma, cutaneous malignant, susceptibility to, 8 2023-04-03 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing The MITF c.1161+4C>T intronic change results in a C to T substitution at the +4 position of intron 9 of the MITF gene. Algorithms that predict the impact of sequence changes on splicing indicate that this variant does not affect splicing. This variant has a maximum subpopulation frequency of 0.026% in gnomAD v2.1.1 (https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/). To our knowledge, this variant has not been reported in individuals with melanoma and renal cell carcinoma. In summary, the evidence currently available is insufficient to determine the clinical significance of this variant. It has therefore been classified as of uncertain significance.
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences RCV003965293 SCV004780387 likely benign MITF-related disorder 2021-12-31 no assertion criteria provided clinical testing This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications).

The information on this website is not intended for direct diagnostic use or medical decision-making without review by a genetics professional. Individuals should not change their health behavior solely on the basis of information contained on this website. Neither the University of Utah nor the National Institutes of Health independently verfies the submitted information. If you have questions about the information contained on this website, please see a health care professional.